From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:41:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] Doc/DT: Add DT binding documentation for MIPI DPI Panel In-Reply-To: <3721050.m43feCICLQ@avalon> References: <1393590016-9361-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <1393590016-9361-6-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <3721050.m43feCICLQ@avalon> Message-ID: <5327EAB3.8080405@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 17/03/14 16:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> +Generic MIPI DPI Panel >> +====================== >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "panel-dpi" >> + >> +Optional properties: >> +- label: a symbolic name for the panel >> +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio > > While integrated in the panel module, the backlight is a separate piece of > hardware, which could be controlled through other means (I2C for instance). > Wouldn't it be better to add an explicit DT node for the backlight device and > reference that node from the panel node ? Yes, I agree, but do we have the infrastructure or bindings for that? Ah, I see we now do have a gpio-backlight driver, but it doesn't have DT bindings. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 901 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: