public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mfuzzey@parkeon.com (Martin Fuzzey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Deadlock with I2C based clock providers
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:26:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5328499D.4040806@parkeon.com> (raw)

Hi Mike,

I have a clock provide that implements the clock operations over i2c.

Although this is now possible since commit 533ddeb1e8 clk: allow 
reentrant calls into the clk framework

that patch only deals with single threaded reentrancy.


The issue I am having involves two threads:

Thread A calls the i2c clock driver
Thread B is in an unrelated driver for another I2C device on the same 
I2C bus (audio codec).


Thread A:
     clk_set_rate(my_clk)
         clk_prepare_lock()  <== Takes clock lock
         clk_change_rate()
             ops->set_rate()
                 i2c_transfer()
                     i2c_lock_adapter()  <== Blocks on I2C bus lock



Thread B:
     i2c_transfer()
         i2c_lock_adapter()    <== Takes I2C bus lock
         i2c_imx_xfer()
             i2c_imx_start()
                 clk_prepare_enable(i2c_clk)
                     clk_prepare_lock()  <== Blocks on clock lock


The problem is that the locks are taken in the reverse order leading to 
a classic deadlock.

I saw your [RFC] clk: reentrancy via per-clock locking but that seemed 
to have other problems.


My current (horrible) workaround involves exposing clk_prepare_lock() 
and calling it from i2c_core but that obviously isn't the right solution.

Regards,

Martin

             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18 13:26 Martin Fuzzey [this message]
2014-03-18 23:29 ` Deadlock with I2C based clock providers Mike Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5328499D.4040806@parkeon.com \
    --to=mfuzzey@parkeon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox