From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:12:43 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung clock changes for v3.15 In-Reply-To: <20140319040715.30995.6371@quantum> References: <1395079197-13598-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <20140319010634.30995.4609@quantum> <5328F09D.9090103@gmail.com> <20140319040715.30995.6371@quantum> Message-ID: <532989BB.9010700@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19.03.2014 05:07, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-18 18:19:25) >> Hi Mike, >> >> On 19.03.2014 02:06, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57) >>>> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>>> >>>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4: >>>> >>>> Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100) >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Samsung clock patches for v3.15. >>>> >>>> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung >>>> tree, so this pull request is rather small. >>> >>> I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it >>> covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take. >>> >>>> It contains various patches >>>> collected since the last merge window: >>>> >>>> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable): >>>> >>>> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers >>>> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset >>>> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] >>>> >>>> 2) clock driver extensions: >>>> >>>> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module >>>> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers >>>> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx >>>> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx >>> >>> Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake >>> when generating this pull request? >> >> The problem with this pull request is that it contains patches that >> require quite a lot of dependencies that have been already applied into >> Samsung SoC tree. I'm not sure how else such situation could be handled, >> other than pulling respective commits into my tree as well. > > There are already a fair number of clk patches going through the samsung > tree. So in the name of consistency for this upcoming merge window it > might be best to take these patches through there as well. Let me know > if that creates any undo burden on you. Otherwise please add: > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette From my perspective, as long as the patches flow upstream, it's one and the same. I wonder whether ARM SoC tree is still open for merges, though. Arnd, Olof? Best regards, Tomasz