From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lersek@redhat.com (Laszlo Ersek)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:33:49 +0100
Subject: [RFC] ARM VM System Sepcification
In-Reply-To: <532E1EFA.9000103@linaro.org>
References: <20140226183454.GA14639@cbox> <20140301152756.67A02C40238@trevor
 .secretlab.ca> <20140306085213.GU643@mal.justgohome.co.uk> <531843EE.
 8040102@redhat.com> <53185FB9.1040308@redhat.com> <20140306120449.GA29916@
 mal.justgohome.co.uk> <20140307122418.2F2C4C408EC@trevor.secretlab.ca> <
 20140322010206.GF25519@cbox> <20140322122354.7644FC418C4@trevor.secretlab.ca>
 <532DEB46.3040107@redhat.com> <532E1EFA.9000103@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <532E2BED.5000506@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/23/14 00:38, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 03:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 22/03/2014 13:23, Grant Likely ha scritto:
>>> VM implementations SHOULD to implement persistent variables for 
>>> their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may be
>>> put on higher level tools. Variable storage SHALL be a property
>>> of a VM instance, but SHALL NOT be stored as part of a portable
>>> disk image. Portable disk images SHALL conform to the UEFI
>>> removable disk requirements from the UEFI spec.
>>
>> I fully agree with this wording.
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> +1 here

I cannot resist getting productive here, so I'll mention that the first
"to" in the language should probably be dropped.

I would also replace the "but" with "and".

Happy to contribute, always.
Laszlo
:)