[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
patch.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
Based on linux-next repo, weird, did I miss something?
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig |   12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index d9f23ad..6085dca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -317,24 +317,12 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
 config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
 	def_bool PM_SLEEP
 
-endmenu
-
-menu "CPU Power Management"
-
 source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
 
 endmenu
 
-menu "Power management options"
-
-source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
-
-source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
-
-endmenu
-
 source "net/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/Kconfig"
-- 
1.7.9.5

[Linaro-acpi] [PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Sudeep Holla]

Hi Hanjun,

On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
> patch.
> 
I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

Hi Sudeep,

On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Hanjun,
> 
> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>> patch.
>>
> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
[...]
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html

Yes, I noticed this patch in arm maillist, and I can see that this
patch was already merged into linux-next, but I still got duplicate
Power management options in the Kconfig:
---------------------------------
menu "Power management options"

source "kernel/power/Kconfig"

config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
	def_bool y

config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
	def_bool PM_SLEEP

endmenu

menu "CPU Power Management"

source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"

source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"

endmenu

menu "Power management options"

source "kernel/power/Kconfig"

source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"

endmenu
--------------------------------
here is the link:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig

Thanks
Hanjun
> 

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Sudeep Holla]

Hi Hanjun,

On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Hanjun,
>>
>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>>> patch.
>>>
>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
> [...]
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html

[...]

> here is the link:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> 

Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
"cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
cleanly.

If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)

Regards,
Sudeep

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Hanjun,
> 
> On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Hi Hanjun,
>>>
>>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
>>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
>>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
>>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
>> [...]
>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
> 
> [...]
> 
>> here is the link:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>
> 
> Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
> "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
> which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
> cleanly.
> 
> If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
> from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)

Rafael is on vacation now.

Catalin, could you please handle this?

Thanks
Hanjun

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, March 27, 2014 08:34:39 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014-3-27 19:12, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi Hanjun,
> > 
> > On 25/03/14 11:09, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> Hi Sudeep,
> >>
> >> On 2014-3-25 18:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> Hi Hanjun,
> >>>
> >>> On 25/03/14 09:00, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>>> After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
> >>>> I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
> >>>> git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
> >>>> patch.
> >>>>
> >>> I reported this and Mark Brown posted the patch[1].
> >>> I assumed it is already pulled, but looks like that's not the case.
> >> [...]
> >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314472.html
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> here is the link:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> >>
> > 
> > Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
> > "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
> > which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
> > cleanly.
> > 
> > If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
> > from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)
> 
> Rafael is on vacation now.
> 
> Catalin, could you please handle this?

Well, not really, I'm at a conference now.

Anyway, I'd rather not drop anything, but if you send me a revert, I can apply it.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Josh Boyer]

Commit 74397174989e5f70 attempted to clean up the power management options
for arm64, but when things were merged it didn't fully take effect.  Fix
it again.

Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 07aa3556952c..8033b9b8a2df 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -321,12 +321,6 @@ menu "CPU Power Management"
 
 source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
 
-source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
-
-endmenu
-
-menu "Power management options"
-
 source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
-- 
1.8.5.3

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Viresh Kumar]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Commit 74397174989e5f70 attempted to clean up the power management options
> for arm64, but when things were merged it didn't fully take effect.  Fix
> it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 07aa3556952c..8033b9b8a2df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -321,12 +321,6 @@ menu "CPU Power Management"
>
>  source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
>
> -source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
> -
> -endmenu
> -
> -menu "Power management options"
> -
>  source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
>
>  source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"

Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

Hi Rafael,

Sorry the late reply.

On 2014-3-27 23:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
>>> Just had a look at the linux-next tree and looks like the original commit:
>>> "cpufreq: enable ARM drivers on arm64" is pulled by both Catalin and Rafael
>>> which has resulted in the fixup patch[1] not removing the duplicate entry
>>> cleanly.
>>>
>>> If not too late it better to ask either Rafael or Catalin to drop both patches
>>> from their tree, instead of creating 4 patches in total to enable cpufreq :)
>>
>> Rafael is on vacation now.
>>
>> Catalin, could you please handle this?
> 
> Well, not really, I'm at a conference now.

Oops...

> 
> Anyway, I'd rather not drop anything, but if you send me a revert, I can apply it.

Mark Brown sent another patch to fix this problem, and that patch already merged
into mainline, but the problem is still there, so I think a single revert will
not help.

How about the following patch? if it is ok, I will resend it.

After commit 74397174989e5 (arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries),
I still get a duplicate Power management options section in linux-next
git repo, may be due to some merge conflicts, anyway, fix that in this
patch.

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
Based on linux-next repo, weird, did I miss something?
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig |   12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index d9f23ad..6085dca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -317,24 +317,12 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
 config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
 	def_bool PM_SLEEP

-endmenu
-
-menu "CPU Power Management"
-
 source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"

 source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"

 endmenu

-menu "Power management options"
-
-source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
-
-source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
-
-endmenu
-
 source "net/Kconfig"

 source "drivers/Kconfig"

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Viresh Kumar]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> How about the following patch? if it is ok, I will resend it.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319545.html

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Catalin Marinas]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:41:57AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> > How about the following patch? if it is ok, I will resend it.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319545.html

I can see commit 62d1a3ba5adc5653d43f6cd3a90758bb6ad5d5bd (arm64: Fix
duplicated Kconfig entries again) already in mainline, so problem
solved.

Thanks Josh ;)

-- 
Catalin

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2014-4-3 16:51, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:41:57AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> How about the following patch? if it is ok, I will resend it.
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319545.html
> 
> I can see commit 62d1a3ba5adc5653d43f6cd3a90758bb6ad5d5bd (arm64: Fix
> duplicated Kconfig entries again) already in mainline, so problem
> solved.
> 
> Thanks Josh ;)

Great, thanks Viresh to let me know this.
Actually I also sent a patch named "arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries
again" about one week ago :)

https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg612363.html

And I think there is still a problem after commit 62d1a3ba - multi-entries
for source "kernel/power/Kconfig", so how about the following fix?

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index e6e4d37..6085dca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -317,14 +317,8 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
 config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
        def_bool PM_SLEEP

-endmenu
-
-menu "CPU Power Management"
-
 source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"

-source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
-
 source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"

 endmenu

If it makes sense, I will send out a patch for it.

Thanks
Hanjun

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2014-4-3 17:27, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014-4-3 16:51, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:41:57AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> How about the following patch? if it is ok, I will resend it.
>>>
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319545.html
>>
>> I can see commit 62d1a3ba5adc5653d43f6cd3a90758bb6ad5d5bd (arm64: Fix
>> duplicated Kconfig entries again) already in mainline, so problem
>> solved.
>>
>> Thanks Josh ;)

I just noticed Josh's patch half a hour ago, that's why I didn't review it...

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Viresh Kumar]

On 3 April 2014 14:57, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> Great, thanks Viresh to let me know this.
> Actually I also sent a patch named "arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries
> again" about one week ago :)
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg612363.html
>
> And I think there is still a problem after commit 62d1a3ba - multi-entries
> for source "kernel/power/Kconfig", so how about the following fix?

I didn't notice that :)

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index e6e4d37..6085dca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -317,14 +317,8 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
>  config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
>         def_bool PM_SLEEP
>
> -endmenu
> -
> -menu "CPU Power Management"
> -
>  source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
>
> -source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
> -
>  source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
>
>  endmenu
>
> If it makes sense, I will send out a patch for it.

We actually need to menu options here,
menu "Power management options"
menu "CPU Power Management"

And so probably you just need to do this:
> -source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
> -

from CPU Power Management options..

[PATCH] arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries again

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2014-4-3 17:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 14:57, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Great, thanks Viresh to let me know this.
>> Actually I also sent a patch named "arm64: Fix duplicated Kconfig entries
>> again" about one week ago :)
>>
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg612363.html
>>
>> And I think there is still a problem after commit 62d1a3ba - multi-entries
>> for source "kernel/power/Kconfig", so how about the following fix?
> 
> I didn't notice that :)
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index e6e4d37..6085dca 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -317,14 +317,8 @@ config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
>>  config ARM64_CPU_SUSPEND
>>         def_bool PM_SLEEP
>>
>> -endmenu
>> -
>> -menu "CPU Power Management"
>> -
>>  source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
>>
>> -source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
>> -
>>  source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig"
>>
>>  endmenu
>>
>> If it makes sense, I will send out a patch for it.
> 
> We actually need to menu options here,
> menu "Power management options"
> menu "CPU Power Management"
> 
> And so probably you just need to do this:
>> -source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
>> -
> 
> from CPU Power Management options..

Ok, will send out a patch later.

Thanks
Hanjun