From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org (Taras Kondratiuk) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:43:47 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: kprobes: big-endian support In-Reply-To: <20140328182256.GO7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <52D3D784.2000600@linaro.org> <53053769.5090100@linaro.org> <5332AB5A.90109@linaro.org> <20140328112841.GF7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5335BBB1.60402@linaro.org> <20140328182256.GO7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <5335ED13.30805@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/28/2014 08:22 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:13:05PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> On 03/28/2014 01:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >>>> On 02/20/2014 12:59 AM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Russell, >>>> >>>> Is there any issue with this pull request? >>>> Should I do something to get it pulled? >>> >>> There's nothing wrong, apart from me being far too busy hacking on really >>> crap code to care about reading much email - which means that lots of >>> email simply just gets buried and lost. >>> >>> There is now a problem with this pull - it conflicts very badly with Dave >>> Long's uprobes code, which I've already pulled, so much so that I'm not >>> happy to do the conflict resolution since I know nothing about this code, >>> and it's a feature I don't make any use of. >> >> I've rebased it onto your for-next branch. Kprobes are functional >> in LE and BE. I'll send an updated pull request after verifying uprobes. > > That's not going to work. for-next is an unstable branch - all the > merge commits there get regenerated on a fairly regular basis. > > A better solution would be to base your patches on top of Dave Long's > changes, which can be found at > > git://git.linaro.org/people/dave.long/linux uprobes-v7 > > and should have an ID of c7edc9e326d5. Ok I'll base on Dave's branch. -- Taras Kondratiuk