From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dirk.behme@gmail.com (Dirk Behme) Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:59:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM i.MX51: Add Digi ConnectCore devicetree In-Reply-To: <20140402174458.GC27994@pengutronix.de> References: <1396075706-25384-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <1396075706-25384-2-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <20140402113934.GH8753@dragon> <20140402125318.GZ17250@pengutronix.de> <20140402174458.GC27994@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <533C4FF5.1010402@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 02.04.2014 19:44, schrieb Robert Schwebel: > [adding Nicolas to Cc] > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:53:18PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:39:35PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: >>>> +&nfc { >>>> + pinctrl-names = "default"; >>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_nfc>; >>>> + nand-bus-width = <8>; >>>> + nand-ecc-mode = "hw"; >>>> + nand-on-flash-bbt; >>>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>>> + #size-cells = <1>; >>>> + status = "okay"; >>>> + >>>> + partition at 0 { >>>> + label = "boot"; >>>> + reg = <0x00000 0x80000>; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>>> + partition at 1 { >>>> + label = "env"; >>>> + reg = <0x80000 0x40000>; >>>> + }; >>> >>> @Sascha, does the argument that we shouldn't have partition table in the >>> mainline dtb still stands? >> >> Yes, I still think the partitions shouldn't be in the Linux dts files. > > The dtb files for the Atmel Xplained board also has a partition > definition, so the same comment applies there, too. > > Besides being no hardware description, this implies a certain way of > using the system; for example, with the "kernel" plus "rootfs" > partitions, it suggests that you can't have the kernel in the standard > root filesystem (which is possible with barebox and the freedesktop.org > bootloader specification). Just out of curiosity, because I never got a good answer to this question (but maybe I asked the wrong way): If not in the dts, where should the partition table be put instead, then? Best regards Dirk