From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kentborg@borg.org (Kent Borg)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 14:01:43 -0400
Subject: mach header files
In-Reply-To: <4379667.784l7DtcMU@wuerfel>
References: <77a25b9038764679b3bda0f3d4018ee1@HKXPR06MB168.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CACxGe6sV7WpQeiGxjnmaatnCCzRBqU=O6qyuQXJd+RYt4QUXgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4379667.784l7DtcMU@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <533EF387.9080702@borg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 04/04/2014 09:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Basically at this point we expect zero code in arch/arm/mach-* for a 
> new platform. 

I am in a position similar to Phil's, bringing up Linux on emulated 
hardware. And obviously I look at existing code to see how things are done.

What is the cleanest look-here-first, least mach-code, SMP example for 
me to try to slavishly copy?


Thanks,

-kb, the Kent who was so glad to see the recent anti-pen ranting, as in 
his looking he couldn't figure out what the pen was for.