From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 19:07:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig In-Reply-To: <2050013.Bv5IMKBfN1@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1396528650-7402-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1487377.07icAKoM8K@vostro.rjw.lan> <53435C0F.3090908@linaro.org> <2050013.Bv5IMKBfN1@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <5343D863.5000802@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2014-4-8 19:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:16:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2014-4-7 20:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:37:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> The UEFI Forum included the ACPI spec in its portfolio in October 2013 >>>> and will host future spec iterations, following the ACPI v5.0a release. >>>> >>>> A UEFI Forum working group named ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG) >>>> has been established to handle future ACPI developments, any UEFI member >>>> can join the group and contribute to ACPI specification. >>>> >>>> So update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig accordingly, >>>> and update the website link to ACPI specification too. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo >>>> --- >>>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig >>>> index c205653..831e541 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig >>>> @@ -32,9 +32,10 @@ menuconfig ACPI >>>> >>>> >>>> ACPI is an open industry specification co-developed by >>>> - Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Microsoft, Phoenix, and Toshiba. >>>> + ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG) under UEFI Forum, any >>>> + UEFI member can join ASWG and contribute to ACPI specification. >>>> The specification is available at: >>>> - >>> >>> The spec is still available from here, so why are you removing this link? >> >> My bad, I thought the link below is the replacement for the above one. >> >>> >>>> + >> >> How about the replacement below? >> >> - >> + , or: > > The "or" is redundant I think, just add the new link below the old one. Ok, I will update my patch and send it out soon. Thanks Hanjun