From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:23:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5346A958.1030302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5346A367.2070107@samsung.com>
On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c
>>
>> The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other macros
>> name in the file.
>>
>> Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled
>> because it
>> was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in
>> the pm's
>> init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not
>> set, which
>> is good.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 54
>> ---------------------------------------
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 19 ++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there was
> already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver,
> which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step
> towards removing one more static IO mapping.
Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it.
Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it
so I can integrate it into the patchset ?
> Also one more thing below.
>
[ ... ]
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
>> @@ -244,6 +276,9 @@ static void exynos_pm_resume(void)
>>
>> s3c_pm_do_restore_core(exynos_core_save,
>> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_core_save));
>>
>> + if (soc_is_exynos5250())
>> + exynos5_core_down_clk();
>> +
>
> Originally this code was executed at system boot-up, but now it is
> happening on resume from sleep. Is this change desired?
Argh ! Sounds like I got a bad fuzz there.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 9:55 [PATCH V4 00/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move the driver to drivers/cpuidle Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 01/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Prevent forward declaration Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 02/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Use cpuidle_register Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 03/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Change function name prefix Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 04/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Encapsulate register access inside a function Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 05/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move some code inside the idle_finisher Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 06/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Fix S5P_WAKEUP_STAT call Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 07/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Use the cpu_pm notifier Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 08/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move scu_enable in " Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 09/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Remove ifdef for scu_enable Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 13:57 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-10 14:23 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-04-10 15:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-11 8:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-11 8:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-11 8:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 11/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Pass wakeup mask parameter to function Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 12/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Encapsulate boot vector code into a function Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 13/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Disable cpuidle for 5440 Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 14/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Encapsulate the AFTR code into a function Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 15/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move the AFTR state function into pm.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 16/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move the power sequence call in the cpu_pm notifier Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 17/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move S5P_CHECK_SLEEP into pm.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 18/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Pass the AFTR callback to the platform_data Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 19/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Cleanup all unneeded headers from cpuidle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-04-10 9:55 ` [PATCH V4 20/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move the driver to drivers/cpuidle directory Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5346A958.1030302@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).