From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:30:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c In-Reply-To: <5346BA09.9020708@samsung.com> References: <1397123751-1957-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1397123751-1957-11-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5346A367.2070107@samsung.com> <5346A958.1030302@linaro.org> <5346BA09.9020708@samsung.com> Message-ID: <5347A816.4020609@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/10/2014 05:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 10.04.2014 16:23, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c >>>> >>>> The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other >>>> macros >>>> name in the file. >>>> >>>> Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled >>>> because it >>>> was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in >>>> the pm's >>>> init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not >>>> set, which >>>> is good. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >>>> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar >>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 54 >>>> --------------------------------------- >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 19 ++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) >>> >>> Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there was >>> already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver, >>> which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step >>> towards removing one more static IO mapping. >> >> Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it. >> >> Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it >> so I can integrate it into the patchset ? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138147021207626&w=2 > > I wonder if it still applies cleanly, though... Ok, if I refer to the date, this patch has been lost in the limbus. So I can integrate it with my patchset without conflicting with any tree. Right ? -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog