linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Control special clock of ADC to support Exynos3250 ADC
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:05:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5347BE67.1080209@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397181640-18513-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com>

Hi Chanwoo,

On 11/04/14 04:00, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch control special clock for ADC in Exynos series's FSYS block.
> If special clock of ADC is registerd on clock list of common clk framework,
> Exynos ADC drvier have to control this clock.
> 
> Exynos3250/Exynos4/Exynos5 has 'adc' clock as following:
> - 'adc' clock: bus clock for ADC
> 
> Exynos3250 has additional 'sclk_tsadc' clock as following:
> - 'sclk_tsadc' clock: special clock for ADC which provide clock to internal ADC
> 
> Exynos 4210/4212/4412 and Exynos5250/5420 has not included 'sclk_tsadc' clock
> in FSYS_BLK. But, Exynos3250 based on Cortex-A7 has only included 'sclk_tsadc'
> clock in FSYS_BLK.

I think a new compatible should be added for the ADC device for Exynos3250
and the required clocks should be handled properly, based on compatible
value. This could be handled, e.g. through some flags in driver's data
selected based on the compatible property value.

And the new clocks should be documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings
/arm/samsung/exynos-adc.txt.

> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-iio at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> index d25b262..4cd1975 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct exynos_adc {
>  	void __iomem		*regs;
>  	void __iomem		*enable_reg;
>  	struct clk		*clk;
> +	struct clk		*sclk;
>  	unsigned int		irq;
>  	struct regulator	*vdd;
>  
> @@ -308,6 +309,13 @@ static int exynos_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_irq;
>  	}
>  
> +	info->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sclk_tsadc");
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->sclk)) {
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed getting sclk clock, err = %ld\n",
> +							PTR_ERR(info->sclk));
> +		info->sclk = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	info->vdd = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vdd");
>  	if (IS_ERR(info->vdd)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed getting regulator, err = %ld\n",
> @@ -341,6 +349,7 @@ static int exynos_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_iio_dev;
>  
>  	clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
> +	clk_prepare_enable(info->sclk);
>  
>  	exynos_adc_hw_init(info);
>  
> @@ -357,6 +366,7 @@ err_of_populate:
>  				exynos_adc_remove_devices);
>  	regulator_disable(info->vdd);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(info->sclk);
>  err_iio_dev:
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  err_irq:
> @@ -373,6 +383,7 @@ static int exynos_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				exynos_adc_remove_devices);
>  	regulator_disable(info->vdd);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(info->sclk);
>  	writel(0, info->enable_reg);
>  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
>  	free_irq(info->irq, info);
> @@ -398,6 +409,7 @@ static int exynos_adc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(info->sclk);
>  	writel(0, info->enable_reg);
>  	regulator_disable(info->vdd);
>  
> @@ -416,6 +428,7 @@ static int exynos_adc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	writel(1, info->enable_reg);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
> +	clk_prepare_enable(info->sclk);
>  
>  	exynos_adc_hw_init(info);
>  
> 

Regards,
Sylwester

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11  2:00 [PATCH] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Control special clock of ADC to support Exynos3250 ADC Chanwoo Choi
2014-04-11  9:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-04-11 10:56   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-04-11 22:52     ` 최찬우
2014-04-11 22:45   ` 최찬우
2014-04-12  7:49     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-04-14  0:58       ` Chanwoo Choi
2014-04-11 10:05 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2014-04-11 22:49   ` 최찬우

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5347BE67.1080209@samsung.com \
    --to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).