From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Jimmy Hon <honyuenkwun@gmail.com>, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Orange Pi 5 Max
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:49:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5348858.6fTUFtlzNn@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173643343615.3320269.13009413932712361979.robh@kernel.org>
Am Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2025, 15:40:33 CET schrieb Rob Herring (Arm):
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 23:16:14 -0600, Jimmy Hon wrote:
> > Add device-tree for Orange Pi 5 Max
> >
> > Orange Pi now has 3 SBCs using the RK3588 SOC. Refactor the common parts
> > of the 5 Plus DTS so it can be shared with the 5 Max and the 5 Ultra.
> > The 5 Max and 5 Ultra have a similar credit-card sized board layout and
> > will also share a DTSI between them.
> >
> > 5 Plus: HDMI0, HDMI1, HDMI RX, M.2 E-key, USB-C
> > 5 Max: HDMI0, HDMI1, WiFi/BT using SDIO/UART
> > 5 Ultra: HDMI1, HDMI RX, WiFi/BT using SDIO/UART
> >
> > Changes in v8:
> > - Rebase with updated 5 Plus USB 3 patch
> >
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Add signed-off to first commit
> > - Expand first commit description
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Remove clock-names from incorrect merge conflict
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Include Orange Pi 5 Plus USB 3.0 change in baseline before refactor
> > - Defer Orange Pi 5 Ultra to a later series
> > - Defer Orange Pi 5 Plus HDMI1 to a later series
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Orange Pi 5 Ultra was released and does not use VP0 to HDMI0
> > - Move HDMI0 from common to the board level
> > - Make DTSI to be shared by the credit card sized 5 Max and 5 Ultra
> > - Updates for the newly submitted HDMI1 support
> > - Add Ack for dt-binding
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Refactor to share common include with Orange Pi 5 Plus
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - squashed commits together for initial board file
> >
> > Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241026100310.52679-1-honyuenkwun@gmail.com/
> >
> > Jimmy Hon (4):
> > arm64: dts: rockchip: refactor common rk3588-orangepi-5.dtsi
> > dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Xunlong Orange Pi 5 Max
> > arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Orange Pi 5 Max board
> > arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable HDMI1 on Orange Pi 5 Max
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-compact.dtsi | 151 ++++
> > .../dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-max.dts | 101 +++
> > .../dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-plus.dts | 855 ++----------------
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5.dtsi | 805 +++++++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 1127 insertions(+), 792 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-compact.dtsi
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5-max.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-orangepi-5.dtsi
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 2859e1ac3110f2d428a794bda26ea0d90b2254c6
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 4672b745f4308a7be527749279edb71625d120e6
> > prerequisite-patch-id: 2743fb64eba2a29eaf993ebc8a5d6ee445b69dfa
> > --
> > 2.47.1
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
> series.
>
> Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
> are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
> maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
> unless the platform maintainer has comments.
>
> If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
> make sure dt-schema is up to date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
>
> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/' for 20250109051619.1825-1-honyuenkwun@gmail.com:
All of them are not caused by the OrangePi5
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-bigtreetech-pi2.dtb: /i2c@fe5c0000/touchscreen@48: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ti,tsc2007']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-bigtreetech-cb2-manta.dtb: /i2c@fe5c0000/touchscreen@48: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ti,tsc2007']
only has a txt binding
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-qnap-ts433.dtb: /serial@fdd50000/mcu: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qnap,ts433-mcu']
binding is in the mfd tree
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-armsom-sige5.dtb: /soc/phy@2b050000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3576-naneng-combphy']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-armsom-sige5.dtb: /soc/phy@2b060000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3576-naneng-combphy']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-evb1-v10.dtb: /soc/phy@2b050000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3576-naneng-combphy']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-evb1-v10.dtb: /soc/phy@2b060000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3576-naneng-combphy']
binding is in the phy tree
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-mecsbc.dtb: /spi@fe610000/fram@0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fujitsu,mb85rs128ty']
binding is in the mtd tree
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 5:16 [PATCH v8 0/4] Orange Pi 5 Max Jimmy Hon
2025-01-09 5:16 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: refactor common rk3588-orangepi-5.dtsi Jimmy Hon
2025-01-09 5:16 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Xunlong Orange Pi 5 Max Jimmy Hon
2025-01-09 5:16 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Orange Pi 5 Max board Jimmy Hon
2025-01-09 5:16 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable HDMI1 on Orange Pi 5 Max Jimmy Hon
2025-01-09 14:40 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] " Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-01-09 21:49 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2025-01-09 22:46 ` (subset) " Heiko Stuebner
2025-02-12 9:22 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5348858.6fTUFtlzNn@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=honyuenkwun@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=megi@xff.cz \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox