From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:56:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534937F0.3020702@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397209481-28542-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset [1].
> I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
> thing easier.
> -configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset)
> -update and consolidation of cpu_power
> -tasks packing algorithm
>
> Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to configure
> the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level like
> the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM architecture.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449
Hi Vincent,
given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4:
For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT
machine):
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cheers,
-- Dietmar
>
> Change since v3:
> - remove last patch which was adding SD_SHARE_POWER_DOMAIN for powerpc's SMT
> level
>
> Change since v2:
> - remove patch 1 as it has been already applied to metag tree for v3.15
> - updates some commit messages
> - add new flag description in TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS description
>
> Change since v1:
> - move sched_domains_curr_level back under #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> - use function pointer to set flag instead of a plain value.
> - add list of tunable flags in the commit message of patch 2
> - add SD_SHARE_POWER_DOMAIN flag for powerpc's SMT level
>
> Vincent Guittot (5):
> sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition
> sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table
> sched: powerpc: create a dedicated topology table
> sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain
> sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table
>
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 26 +++++
> arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h | 24 ----
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 31 +++--
> arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 13 +--
> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 20 ++++
> arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h | 33 ------
> include/linux/sched.h | 49 +++++++-
> include/linux/topology.h | 128 +++-----------------
> kernel/sched/core.c | 244 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 9 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 313 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-12 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 9:44 [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34 ` [PATCH] fix: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: powerpc: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:54 ` [PATCH] fix: sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 11:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 14:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 15:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-24 7:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-24 12:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 7:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-25 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-12 12:56 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2014-04-14 7:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-04-15 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534937F0.3020702@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).