[PATCH] tty/serial: atmel_serial: Fix device tree documentation

[richard.genoud@gmail.com (Richard Genoud)]

On 15/04/2014 10:00, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:39:59AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> On 14/04/2014 17:22, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:58:02PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
>>>> RTS pin is an active low pin.
>>>> For now, this doesn't change anything as the ACTIVE_LOW flag is not
>>>> handled in atmel_serial, but it will be in 3.16.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
>>>> index 17c1042b2df8..2f7aad71b3c9 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel-usart.txt
>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Example:
>>>>  		clock-names = "usart";
>>>>  		atmel,use-dma-rx;
>>>>  		atmel,use-dma-tx;
>>>> -		rts-gpios = <&pioD 15 0>;
>>>> +		rts-gpios = <&pioD 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>
>>> I was told we should not use macros here. If it is still the truth:
>>>
>>> rts-gpios = <&pioD 15 1>;
>>
>> But I'd really like to know if macros are forbidden in DT documentation and why...
>> Because, IMHO, <&pioD 15 1> talks less that <&pioD 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>.
>> Which is a shame in a documentation.
> 
> I don't remember who told me that but the reason was that device tree
> should not depend on Linux and macros are relative to Linux.
> 
Well, that makes sense, but I thought that include/dt-bindings/ was more
DT relative.