From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:42:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: Device tree for AXM55xx. In-Reply-To: <02c006a6fc64131df82981abbc1c71c7af52254e.1397552154.git.anders.berg@lsi.com> References: <02c006a6fc64131df82981abbc1c71c7af52254e.1397552154.git.anders.berg@lsi.com> Message-ID: <534D294D.7000201@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Anders, On 15/04/14 13:06, Anders Berg wrote: > Add device tree for the Amarillo validation board with an AXM5516 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Anders Berg > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts | 51 ++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-cpus.dtsi | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/axm55xx.dtsi | 306 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 562 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-cpus.dtsi > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/axm55xx.dtsi > [...] > + gic: interrupt-controller at 2001001000 { > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic"; > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > + #address-cells = <0>; > + interrupt-controller; > + reg = <0x20 0x01001000 0 0x1000>, > + <0x20 0x01002000 0 0x1000>, > + <0x20 0x01004000 0 0x2000>, > + <0x20 0x01006000 0 0x2000>; > + interrupts = + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; > + }; Given how many CPUs this system has, what's the catch regarding the GIC? Is there a second one shadowing this one at the same address for another set of 8 CPUs? Is there an additional mechanism to IPI the other CPUs? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...