From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:36:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Support cpufreq driver for Exynos3250 In-Reply-To: References: <1397787634-9334-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <53527F54.5020601@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53528A00.6090906@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19.04.2014 16:35, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > > On 19 April 2014 19:21, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi Chanwoo, Sachin, >> >> >> On 19.04.2014 15:43, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sachin, >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Sachin Kamat >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Chanwoo, >>>> >>>> On 18 April 2014 07:50, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This patchset support cpufreq driver for Exynos3250 which uses the >>>>> Cortex-A7 >>>>> dual cores and has a target speed of 1.0 GHz and code clean using >>>>> dev_err/info >>>>> instead of pr_err/info function. >>>> >>>> >>>> Per SoC cpufreq driver which does not use CCF is no more encouraged for >>>> new >>>> Exynos platforms. Thomas has already posted patches to make use of >>>> generic cpu freq driver >>>> on Exynos platforms. Please refer to [1] and try to utilize it for >>>> this platform as well. >>>> >>>> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/26886 >>> >>> >>> OK, I'll refer to this new patch for cpufreq and rebase it. >>> >>> Thanks for your reply. >> >> >> The last version posted by Thomas still had several comments to be addressed >> that could lead to quite big changes in the whole design in next version. >> According to the information from Thomas, the work on it is in progress and >> we should see updated patchset soon. > > Yes, that is right. I wanted Chanwoo to be aware of this new design > and track the same. > Sure. Just wanted to make sure this is clear. Best regards, Tomasz