From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:12:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: LLVMLinux: Add missing abort() for AARCH64 In-Reply-To: <1409959302-13976-1-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com> References: <1409959302-13976-1-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com> Message-ID: <53558632.2D4ZDSZcaf@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 05 September 2014 16:21:42 behanw at converseincode.com wrote: > From: Mark Charlebois > > Add missing abort for arch aarch64. > > This patch makes the aarch64 kernel able to compile with gcc or clang. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois > Signed-off-by: Behan Webster You don't describe why this is needed. When does clang emit an abort() call? Is that the expected behavior when not linking against a full C library? > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > index 02cd3f0..123cd6e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > @@ -349,6 +349,15 @@ void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val) > pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val); > } > > +void abort(void) > +{ > + BUG(); > + > + /* if that doesn't kill us, halt */ > + panic("Oops failed to kill thread"); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(abort); I don't see the point in doing both BUG() and panic(). Doesn't panic() already print all the information you want in this case? Arnd