From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:38:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration for Exynos5420 In-Reply-To: <1398080958-21677-4-git-send-email-chander.kashyap@linaro.org> References: <1398080958-21677-1-git-send-email-chander.kashyap@linaro.org> <1398080958-21677-4-git-send-email-chander.kashyap@linaro.org> Message-ID: <535646A1.1020201@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/21/2014 01:49 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote: > Exynos5420 is big.Little Soc. It uses cpuidle-big-litle generic cpuidle driver. > Hence do not allow exynos cpuidle driver registration for Exynos5420. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano but will conflict with: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg319862.html > arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c > index c57cae0..242f75d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c > @@ -219,6 +219,9 @@ static int exynos_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > int cpu_id, ret; > struct cpuidle_device *device; > > + if (soc_is_exynos5420()) > + return -ENODEV; > + > if (soc_is_exynos5250()) > exynos5_core_down_clk(); > > -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog