linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] dma: ste_dma40: Maintain spinlock order while handling pause
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:39:53 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53582519.7020805@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398282724-2607-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On 04/23/2014 11:52 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> The runtime PM resume callback needs to be executed while holding the
> spinlock, make sure to maintain this for the pause operation as well.

> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c |    2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index bf18c78..6e97cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> @@ -1495,8 +1495,8 @@ static int d40_pause(struct d40_chan *d40c)
>   	if (!d40c->busy)
>   		return 0;
>
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(d40c->base->dev);
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&d40c->lock, flags);
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(d40c->base->dev);

   That function may sleep AFAIK, so you can't really call it with a spinlock 
held. Or do I miss something?

WBR, Sergei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 19:52 [PATCH 1/4] dma: ste_dma40: Maintain spinlock order while handling pause Ulf Hansson
2014-04-23 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma: ste_dma40: Don't require CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Ulf Hansson
2014-04-24 12:54   ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] dma: ste_dma40: Convert to PM macros while providing the PM callbacks Ulf Hansson
2014-04-24 12:55   ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] dma: ste_dma40: Fixup system suspend/resume Ulf Hansson
2014-04-24 12:55   ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-23 20:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-04-24  9:11   ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: ste_dma40: Maintain spinlock order while handling pause Ulf Hansson
2014-04-24 13:25 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-07  6:22 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-07  8:41   ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53582519.7020805@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).