From: sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clkdev: only fall through to clk_get_sys() if DT indicates no entry
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:08:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535D55C6.9090609@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1We4rQ-0001mv-Ps@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 04/26/2014 05:49 PM, Russell King wrote:
> There are two failures which DT can return when looking up a phandle:
> -ENOENT - when DT finds that the desired property/index is not present
> -EINVAL - when DT finds that the desired property/index is present, but
> there is a problem parsing it.
>
> We should only fall through to clk_get_sys() (the table driven clock
> lookup) when DT indicates that there was no entry in the OF tables
> for the clock. Doing otherwise causes the clk API to always indicate
> that there is no entry for this clock, which is not correct behaviour.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> Grant, Rob,
>
> Please let me know ASAP if this gives you any cause for concern. This
> looks to me like a long standing bug which really needs fixing. Part
> of the motivation here is similar to Jean-Francois' patch to clkdev
> which allows a DT specified clock which isn't get present to have
> clk_get() and friends return -EPROBE_DEFER - again, something that I
> think really should happen. Jean-Francois hasn't been able to get
> much traction for his patch, so let's start with fixing this bug first.
How about upstream commit a34cd4666f3da84228a82f70c94b8d9b692034ea,
I thought it already solves the issue you're trying to address in
this patch ?
> drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> index 48f67218247c..4e65d0e10b05 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>
> if (dev) {
> clk = of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, con_id);
> - if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> + if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) != -ENOENT)
> return clk;
> }
--
Regards,
Sylwester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-27 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-26 15:49 [PATCH] clkdev: only fall through to clk_get_sys() if DT indicates no entry Russell King
2014-04-27 19:08 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2014-04-27 19:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-27 21:37 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535D55C6.9090609@gmail.com \
--to=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox