From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:48:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: Check if a CPU has gone offline In-Reply-To: <20140428130639.GD2868@lvm> References: <1398455329-18136-1-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <1398455329-18136-4-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <535E519B.7070101@redhat.com> <20140428130639.GD2868@lvm> Message-ID: <535E5C2D.4090405@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Il 28/04/2014 15:06, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: >> > >> > Is Anup's patchset already on a branch? If you send me a pointer to >> > it I can look at that branch history and see what's best. >> > > I didn't merge it yet - need to make one final pass over it (likely > later tonight). > > But this is the series: > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2014-April/009061.html Even better. :) 1) Catalin can apply "Add common header for PSCI related defines", or Ashwin can resend his series with the patch at the beginning. Duplicate commits are fine, especially for seldom-modified files where they do not cause conflicts. 2) Send Anup's patchset as a pull request to both me and Catalin, relative to v3.16-rc1, both of us can apply it and Ashwin's series can be commit on top. Paolo