Re: [PATCH 5/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Relocate atomic_threshold to scmi_desc

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:35:57PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:20:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 09:06:02AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> thanks for having a look.
> 
> > > @@ -2959,7 +2952,7 @@ static struct scmi_debug_info *scmi_debugfs_common_setup(struct scmi_info *info)
> > >  			   (char **)&dbg->name);
> > >  
> > >  	debugfs_create_u32("atomic_threshold_us", 0400, top_dentry,
> > > -			   &info->atomic_threshold);
> > > +			   (u32 *)&info->desc->atomic_threshold);
> > 
> > This cast is unnecessary.
> 
> I was indeed wondering why I added that....then I remember something
> about debugfs_create....without that (u32 *):
> 
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c: In function ‘scmi_debugfs_common_setup’:
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c:2988:28: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘debugfs_create_u32’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>                              &info->desc->atomic_threshold);
>                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> since the enclosing struct ->desc is const AND debugfs_create_u32 is NOT
> smart enough to expect a const when the property is R_ONLY...unless I am
> missing something.
> 

Ah, I missed the const.  Sorry about that.

regards,
dan carpenter