From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:08:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v12 00/31] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT In-Reply-To: <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> References: <1398584283-22846-1-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com> <26065037.GxQQuIURPg@wuerfel> <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> Message-ID: <5369252F.4070402@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06.05.2014 19:59, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: >> This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here >> doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions >> very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and >> again is quite a hard job. >> >> If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of >> above patches, >> which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on >> DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help >> in reducing the rework and review effort every time. >> >> Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver >> can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind. > > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the > dt-independend parts. +1. I would also suggest dropping patch 18/31, for the reasons I mentioned in my reply to it. Best regards, Tomasz