linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
@ 2014-05-08 13:36 Hans de Goede
  2014-05-08 14:21 ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2014-05-08 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

The commit titled: "pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce per-driver Kconfig options"
adds a bunch of new Kconfig options, but nothing sets them resulting in a
non working kernel. Since they are per sunxi family, and we already have
sunxi family Kconfig options, make those options select the necessary
Kconfig options.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
index 3aff966..beab32e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ menuconfig ARCH_SUNXI
 	select CLKSRC_MMIO
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
 	select PINCTRL
-	select PINCTRL_SUNXI
 	select SUN4I_TIMER
 
 if ARCH_SUNXI
@@ -12,11 +11,14 @@ if ARCH_SUNXI
 config MACH_SUN4I
 	bool "Allwinner A10 (sun4i) SoCs support"
 	default ARCH_SUNXI
+	select PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
 
 config MACH_SUN5I
 	bool "Allwinner A10s / A13 (sun5i) SoCs support"
 	default ARCH_SUNXI
 	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
+	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A10S
+	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A13
 
 config MACH_SUN6I
 	bool "Allwinner A31 (sun6i) SoCs support"
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ config MACH_SUN6I
 	select ARM_GIC
 	select RESET_CONTROLLER
 	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
+	select PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31
 
 config MACH_SUN7I
 	bool "Allwinner A20 (sun7i) SoCs support"
@@ -33,5 +36,6 @@ config MACH_SUN7I
 	select ARM_PSCI
 	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
 	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
+	select PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
 
 endif
-- 
1.9.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
  2014-05-08 13:36 [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled Hans de Goede
@ 2014-05-08 14:21 ` Maxime Ripard
  2014-05-08 14:35   ` Hans de Goede
  2014-05-08 21:56   ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2014-05-08 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Hans,

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:36:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The commit titled: "pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce per-driver Kconfig options"
> adds a bunch of new Kconfig options, but nothing sets them resulting in a
> non working kernel. Since they are per sunxi family, and we already have
> sunxi family Kconfig options, make those options select the necessary
> Kconfig options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> index 3aff966..beab32e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ menuconfig ARCH_SUNXI
>  	select CLKSRC_MMIO
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>  	select PINCTRL
> -	select PINCTRL_SUNXI
>  	select SUN4I_TIMER
>  
>  if ARCH_SUNXI
> @@ -12,11 +11,14 @@ if ARCH_SUNXI
>  config MACH_SUN4I
>  	bool "Allwinner A10 (sun4i) SoCs support"
>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
>  
>  config MACH_SUN5I
>  	bool "Allwinner A10s / A13 (sun5i) SoCs support"
>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A10S
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A13
>  
>  config MACH_SUN6I
>  	bool "Allwinner A31 (sun6i) SoCs support"
> @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ config MACH_SUN6I
>  	select ARM_GIC
>  	select RESET_CONTROLLER
>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31
>  
>  config MACH_SUN7I
>  	bool "Allwinner A20 (sun7i) SoCs support"
> @@ -33,5 +36,6 @@ config MACH_SUN7I
>  	select ARM_PSCI
>  	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
>  
>  endif

I already posted a similar patch that is still pending. I was only
waiting for Linus to merge the branch I gave him to merge it in my
tree.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/251704.html

I don't think he actually merged the branch yet. How did you
encounter such breakage?

Thanks,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140508/3920d05f/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
  2014-05-08 14:21 ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2014-05-08 14:35   ` Hans de Goede
  2014-05-08 15:36     ` Maxime Ripard
  2014-05-08 21:56   ` Linus Walleij
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2014-05-08 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

On 05/08/2014 04:21 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:36:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The commit titled: "pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce per-driver Kconfig options"
>> adds a bunch of new Kconfig options, but nothing sets them resulting in a
>> non working kernel. Since they are per sunxi family, and we already have
>> sunxi family Kconfig options, make those options select the necessary
>> Kconfig options.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> index 3aff966..beab32e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
>> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ menuconfig ARCH_SUNXI
>>  	select CLKSRC_MMIO
>>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>>  	select PINCTRL
>> -	select PINCTRL_SUNXI
>>  	select SUN4I_TIMER
>>  
>>  if ARCH_SUNXI
>> @@ -12,11 +11,14 @@ if ARCH_SUNXI
>>  config MACH_SUN4I
>>  	bool "Allwinner A10 (sun4i) SoCs support"
>>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
>> +	select PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
>>  
>>  config MACH_SUN5I
>>  	bool "Allwinner A10s / A13 (sun5i) SoCs support"
>>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
>>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
>> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A10S
>> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A13
>>  
>>  config MACH_SUN6I
>>  	bool "Allwinner A31 (sun6i) SoCs support"
>> @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ config MACH_SUN6I
>>  	select ARM_GIC
>>  	select RESET_CONTROLLER
>>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
>> +	select PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31
>>  
>>  config MACH_SUN7I
>>  	bool "Allwinner A20 (sun7i) SoCs support"
>> @@ -33,5 +36,6 @@ config MACH_SUN7I
>>  	select ARM_PSCI
>>  	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
>> +	select PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
>>  
>>  endif
> 
> I already posted a similar patch that is still pending. I was only
> waiting for Linus to merge the branch I gave him to merge it in my
> tree.
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/251704.html
> 
> I don't think he actually merged the branch yet. How did you
> encounter such breakage?

I've been sucking up various branches and posted patches for the next
sunxi-devel, including your sunxi/pinctrl-for-3.16 branch.

Regards,

Hans

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
  2014-05-08 14:35   ` Hans de Goede
@ 2014-05-08 15:36     ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2014-05-08 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:35:29PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/08/2014 04:21 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> > 
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:36:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> The commit titled: "pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce per-driver Kconfig options"
> >> adds a bunch of new Kconfig options, but nothing sets them resulting in a
> >> non working kernel. Since they are per sunxi family, and we already have
> >> sunxi family Kconfig options, make those options select the necessary
> >> Kconfig options.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> index 3aff966..beab32e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ menuconfig ARCH_SUNXI
> >>  	select CLKSRC_MMIO
> >>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> >>  	select PINCTRL
> >> -	select PINCTRL_SUNXI
> >>  	select SUN4I_TIMER
> >>  
> >>  if ARCH_SUNXI
> >> @@ -12,11 +11,14 @@ if ARCH_SUNXI
> >>  config MACH_SUN4I
> >>  	bool "Allwinner A10 (sun4i) SoCs support"
> >>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
> >> +	select PINCTRL_SUN4I_A10
> >>  
> >>  config MACH_SUN5I
> >>  	bool "Allwinner A10s / A13 (sun5i) SoCs support"
> >>  	default ARCH_SUNXI
> >>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> >> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A10S
> >> +	select PINCTRL_SUN5I_A13
> >>  
> >>  config MACH_SUN6I
> >>  	bool "Allwinner A31 (sun6i) SoCs support"
> >> @@ -25,6 +27,7 @@ config MACH_SUN6I
> >>  	select ARM_GIC
> >>  	select RESET_CONTROLLER
> >>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> >> +	select PINCTRL_SUN6I_A31
> >>  
> >>  config MACH_SUN7I
> >>  	bool "Allwinner A20 (sun7i) SoCs support"
> >> @@ -33,5 +36,6 @@ config MACH_SUN7I
> >>  	select ARM_PSCI
> >>  	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> >>  	select SUN5I_HSTIMER
> >> +	select PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
> >>  
> >>  endif
> > 
> > I already posted a similar patch that is still pending. I was only
> > waiting for Linus to merge the branch I gave him to merge it in my
> > tree.
> > 
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/251704.html
> > 
> > I don't think he actually merged the branch yet. How did you
> > encounter such breakage?
> 
> I've been sucking up various branches and posted patches for the next
> sunxi-devel, including your sunxi/pinctrl-for-3.16 branch.

Ok, so yes, you need such a patch :)

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140508/d57c0973/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
  2014-05-08 14:21 ` Maxime Ripard
  2014-05-08 14:35   ` Hans de Goede
@ 2014-05-08 21:56   ` Linus Walleij
  2014-05-09  0:41     ` [linux-sunxi] " Maxime Ripard
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-05-08 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> I already posted a similar patch that is still pending. I was only
> waiting for Linus to merge the branch I gave him to merge it in my
> tree.

I haven't recieved a branch :-(

I don't know if the error is on my side ... I only have a mail stating you
will send a pull request but not the pull request itself.

Can you please resend the pull reques *and* include the fixup patch
on that branch?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled
  2014-05-08 21:56   ` Linus Walleij
@ 2014-05-09  0:41     ` Maxime Ripard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2014-05-09  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:56:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > I already posted a similar patch that is still pending. I was only
> > waiting for Linus to merge the branch I gave him to merge it in my
> > tree.
> 
> I haven't recieved a branch :-(
> 
> I don't know if the error is on my side ... I only have a mail stating you
> will send a pull request but not the pull request itself.
> 
> Can you please resend the pull reques *and* include the fixup patch
> on that branch?

I resent the pull request without the patch because it depends on
something that is in my branch. I'd much prefer that you provide a
stable branch I can merge into my branch, and then, apply it myself.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140508/b46977dd/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-09  0:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-08 13:36 [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi Ensure the correct pinctrl drivers are enabled Hans de Goede
2014-05-08 14:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 14:35   ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-08 15:36     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 21:56   ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-09  0:41     ` [linux-sunxi] " Maxime Ripard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).