* [PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs
@ 2014-05-09 14:30 Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 14:33 ` Nicolas Ferre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Boris BREZILLON @ 2014-05-09 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
"RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
Hence we should not rely on what IMR claims about already masked IRQs
and just disable all IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
Changes since v3:
- fix commit message and comment
Changes since v2:
- removed unused variable 'mask'
Changes since v1:
- use a macro to define IRQs bitmask
- read IMR register to ensure the write to IDR has been flushed
- quote atmel's datasheet errata in commit message
- comment the code to describe why we're not using IMR to disable
the interrupts
arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
index 2ba694f..f8bc351 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
@@ -25,24 +25,28 @@
#include "generic.h"
-#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
-#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
+#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
+#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
+#define AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK 0x1f /* Available IRQs mask */
void __init at91_sysirq_mask_rtc(u32 rtc_base)
{
void __iomem *base;
- u32 mask;
base = ioremap(rtc_base, 64);
if (!base)
return;
- mask = readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR);
- if (mask) {
- pr_info("AT91: Disabling rtc irq\n");
- writel_relaxed(mask, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
- (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
- }
+ /*
+ * sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
+ * "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
+ * Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
+ *
+ * Hence we're not relying on IMR values to disable
+ * interrupts.
+ */
+ writel_relaxed(AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
+ (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
iounmap(base);
}
--
1.8.3.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs
2014-05-09 14:30 [PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs Boris BREZILLON
@ 2014-05-09 14:33 ` Nicolas Ferre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2014-05-09 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09/05/2014 16:30, Boris BREZILLON :
> sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
>
> Hence we should not rely on what IMR claims about already masked IRQs
> and just disable all IRQs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - fix commit message and comment
> Changes since v2:
> - removed unused variable 'mask'
> Changes since v1:
> - use a macro to define IRQs bitmask
> - read IMR register to ensure the write to IDR has been flushed
> - quote atmel's datasheet errata in commit message
> - comment the code to describe why we're not using IMR to disable
> the interrupts
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> index 2ba694f..f8bc351 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> @@ -25,24 +25,28 @@
>
> #include "generic.h"
>
> -#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> -#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK 0x1f /* Available IRQs mask */
>
> void __init at91_sysirq_mask_rtc(u32 rtc_base)
> {
> void __iomem *base;
> - u32 mask;
>
> base = ioremap(rtc_base, 64);
> if (!base)
> return;
>
> - mask = readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR);
> - if (mask) {
> - pr_info("AT91: Disabling rtc irq\n");
> - writel_relaxed(mask, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> - (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
> - }
> + /*
> + * sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> + * "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> + * Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
> + *
> + * Hence we're not relying on IMR values to disable
> + * interrupts.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed(AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> + (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
>
> iounmap(base);
> }
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-09 14:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-09 14:30 [PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 14:33 ` Nicolas Ferre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).