From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde) Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:36:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv3] C_CAN: hwinit support for non-TI devices In-Reply-To: <20140513130914.GA9806@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <1398716449.836.4.camel@dinh-ubuntu> <20140428211505.GA28242@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140430215359.GA15148@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140502084851.GA5730@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140505120801.GA16461@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140506135702.GA9879@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <5370ED11.4000002@pengutronix.de> <20140513130914.GA9806@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Message-ID: <53721FD5.50508@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/13/2014 03:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Non-TI chips (including socfpga) needs different raminit > sequence. Implement it. > > const's in the hwinit prototype forced me to add const to more > prototypes. This makes changes bigger but the result is cleaner. Why not split into several patches? > Unfortunately, testing-c_can does not boot on sockit, but previous > version of patch was tested by me and Thor Thayer. Have a look at: git at gitorious.org:linux-can/linux-can-next.git testing-c_can-based-on-net This branch uses net/master as it's base, I've split your patch into 3, and squashed the 32bit-const changes into the 32-bit access patch. The remaining patch looks quite clean. Can you please test the branch, I hope it boots on sockit. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 242 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: