* [GIT PULL 2/4] Samsung clock non-critical fixes for v3.16
2014-05-14 18:03 [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16 Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-14 18:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 3/4] Samsung clock clean-up " Tomasz Figa
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-05-14 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The following changes since commit d39e55e06371c1ba9d11f4a17a56a0f925d12415:
clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260 (2014-05-14 19:16:55 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git for_3.16/clk_fixes_non_critical
for you to fetch changes up to 773424326b51cc851b6e28ff22447ba5fcc5f429:
clk: samsung: exynos5420: add more registers to restore list (2014-05-14 19:40:24 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung clock non-critical fixes for v3.16.
This pull requests contains a number of non-critical fixes for Samsung clock
framework and drivers, including:
1) a series of fixes for Exynos5420 to correct clock definitions and make the
driver closer to the documentation,
2) several missing clocks and clock IDs added to Exynos4, Exynos5250 and
Exynos5420 drivers,
3) fix for incorrect initialization of clock table with NULL,
4) compiler warning fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Arun Kumar K (2):
clk: samsung: exynos5250: Add clocks for G3D
clk: samsung: exynos5420: Add clock IDs needed by GPU
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi (1):
clk: samsung: exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
Pankaj Dubey (1):
clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
Sachin Kamat (1):
clk: samsung: exynos5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
Shaik Ameer Basha (15):
clk: samsung: exynos5420: Rename mux parent arrays
clk: samsung: exynos5420: add clocks for ISP block
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for GSCL and MSCL blocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: fix parent clocks for mscl sysmmu
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for G2D and G3D blocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for DISP1 block
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for PERIC block
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for PERIS and GEN blocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for WCORE block
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for FSYS and FSYS2 blocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: correct sysmmu-mfc parent clocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: fix register offset for sclk_bpll
clk: samsung: exynos5420: update clocks for MAU Block
clk: samsung: exynos5420: add misc clocks
clk: samsung: exynos5420: add more registers to restore list
Sylwester Nawrocki (1):
clk: samsung: exynos4: Use single clock ID for CLK_MDMA gate clocks
Tomasz Figa (1):
clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
Tomasz Stanislawski (1):
clk: samsung: exynos4: export sclk_hdmiphy clock
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 14 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 4 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 16 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 854 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 9 +-
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h | 2 +-
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 5 +-
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 39 +-
8 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 335 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 3/4] Samsung clock clean-up for v3.16
2014-05-14 18:03 [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16 Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/4] Samsung clock non-critical fixes " Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-14 18:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 4/4] Samsung clock support for Exynos3250 " Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 19:59 ` [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support " Kukjin Kim
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-05-14 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The following changes since commit 773424326b51cc851b6e28ff22447ba5fcc5f429:
clk: samsung: exynos5420: add more registers to restore list (2014-05-14 19:40:24 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git for_3.16/clk_cleanup
for you to fetch changes up to 3bc0c5a16d65ef2a2edb7326f5b77d6a5bcf08a5:
drivers: clk: use COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG for Samsung clock support (2014-05-14 19:41:15 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung clock clean-up for v3.16.
This pull requests contains minor clean-up related to Samsung clock support,
including:
1) move Kconfig entries of Samsung clock drivers to drivers/clk,
2) compile drivers/clk/samsung conditionally when COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG is
selected,
3) remove obsolete Kconfig lines after moving s3c24xx to CCF.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pankaj Dubey (4):
clk: samsung: add new Kconfig for Samsung common clock option
ARM: select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG for ARCH_EXYNOS and ARCH_S3C64XX
ARM: S3C24XX: move S3C24XX clock Kconfig options to Samsung clock Kconfig file
drivers: clk: use COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG for Samsung clock support
Tomasz Figa (1):
ARM: S3C24XX: Remove omitted Kconfig selects and conditionals
.../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2410-clock.txt | 2 +-
arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 +--
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig | 39 +++-------------------
drivers/clk/Kconfig | 2 ++
drivers/clk/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 4/4] Samsung clock support for Exynos3250 for v3.16
2014-05-14 18:03 [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16 Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/4] Samsung clock non-critical fixes " Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 3/4] Samsung clock clean-up " Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-14 18:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 19:59 ` [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support " Kukjin Kim
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-05-14 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The following changes since commit 3bc0c5a16d65ef2a2edb7326f5b77d6a5bcf08a5:
drivers: clk: use COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG for Samsung clock support (2014-05-14 19:41:15 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git for_3.16/exynos3250
for you to fetch changes up to 2ce16c53422a17c0afea8203dd96ac1e7a142cf9:
clk: samsung: exynos3250: Add clocks using common clock framework (2014-05-14 19:41:32 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung clock support for Exynos3250 for v3.16.
This small pull request contains a patch adding clock driver for Exynos3250,
which depends on previous pull requests in this series.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Figa (1):
clk: samsung: exynos3250: Add clocks using common clock framework
drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 780 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos3250.h | 258 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 1039 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos3250.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 18:03 [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16 Tomasz Figa
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-14 18:03 ` [GIT PULL 4/4] Samsung clock support for Exynos3250 " Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-14 19:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-14 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-05-14 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Mike,
I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
How do you think? Basically I need your agreement for it.
Thanks,
Kukjin
> The following changes since commit 2916f9a2c6d9200b4c840a613cd1fa1dad04240f:
>
> ARM: S3C24XX: remove SAMSUNG_CLOCK remnants after ccf conversion (2014-05-13 08:00:46 +0900)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git for_3.16/exynos5260
>
> for you to fetch changes up to d39e55e06371c1ba9d11f4a17a56a0f925d12415:
>
> clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260 (2014-05-14 19:16:55 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16.
>
> This pull request contains patches preparing Samsung Common Clock Framework
> helpers to support Exynos5260 by adding support for multiple clock providers
> and then adding clock driver for Exynos5260.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Pankaj Dubey (1):
> clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
>
> Rahul Sharma (4):
> clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
> clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
> clk/exynos5260: add macros and documentation for exynos5260
> clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5260-clock.txt | 190 ++
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 47 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 25 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c | 1980 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.h | 459 +++++
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 24 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c | 18 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 223 ++-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 2 +
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c | 51 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c | 29 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c | 46 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 44 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 114 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 72 +-
> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5260-clk.h | 469 +++++
> 17 files changed, 3589 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5260-clock.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.h
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5260-clk.h
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 19:59 ` [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support " Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-05-14 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-14 20:20 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2014-05-14 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-14 12:59:22)
> On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
> they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
> stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
> tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
> required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
The Samsung clk pull requests only touch two arch/arm Kconfig files and
one dtsi file. That's not a lot of arch/arm churn. Is there a strong
reason that this needs to go through the samsung/arm-soc trees?
Otherwise it should continue to go through the clk tree.
>
> How do you think? Basically I need your agreement for it.
Based on the above pull requests I do not see the need for changing how
code gets merged.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Thanks,
> Kukjin
>
>
> > The following changes since commit 2916f9a2c6d9200b4c840a613cd1fa1dad04240f:
> >
> > ARM: S3C24XX: remove SAMSUNG_CLOCK remnants after ccf conversion (2014-05-13 08:00:46 +0900)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git for_3.16/exynos5260
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to d39e55e06371c1ba9d11f4a17a56a0f925d12415:
> >
> > clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260 (2014-05-14 19:16:55 +0200)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16.
> >
> > This pull request contains patches preparing Samsung Common Clock Framework
> > helpers to support Exynos5260 by adding support for multiple clock providers
> > and then adding clock driver for Exynos5260.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Pankaj Dubey (1):
> > clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
> >
> > Rahul Sharma (4):
> > clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
> > clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
> > clk/exynos5260: add macros and documentation for exynos5260
> > clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5260-clock.txt | 190 ++
> > drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 47 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 25 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c | 1980 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.h | 459 +++++
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 24 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c | 18 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 223 ++-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 2 +
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c | 51 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c | 29 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c | 46 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 44 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 114 +-
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 72 +-
> > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5260-clk.h | 469 +++++
> > 17 files changed, 3589 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5260-clock.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.h
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5260-clk.h
> > --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
@ 2014-05-14 20:20 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-14 22:07 ` Mike Turquette
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-05-14 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Mike,
On 14.05.2014 22:13, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-14 12:59:22)
>> On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
>> they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
>> stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
>> tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
>> required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
>
> The Samsung clk pull requests only touch two arch/arm Kconfig files and
> one dtsi file. That's not a lot of arch/arm churn. Is there a strong
> reason that this needs to go through the samsung/arm-soc trees?
> Otherwise it should continue to go through the clk tree.
Obviously they are patches for Samsung clock drivers. ;)
The issue here is that there is a number of patches already merged in
Samsung tree on which the patches discussed here depend.
>
>>
>> How do you think? Basically I need your agreement for it.
>
> Based on the above pull requests I do not see the need for changing how
> code gets merged.
As long as there are no dependencies on arch code and series being
applied do not touch arch code, this is perfectly fine. Unfortunately
this is rarely the case, at least for Samsung platforms and at least for
now. After we finish with arch clean-up and move all code to appropriate
subsystems, it should become easier, though.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 20:20 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-14 22:07 ` Mike Turquette
2014-05-14 22:16 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2014-05-14 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-05-14 13:20:14)
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 14.05.2014 22:13, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-14 12:59:22)
> >> On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
> >> they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
> >> stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
> >> tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
> >> required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
> >
> > The Samsung clk pull requests only touch two arch/arm Kconfig files and
> > one dtsi file. That's not a lot of arch/arm churn. Is there a strong
> > reason that this needs to go through the samsung/arm-soc trees?
> > Otherwise it should continue to go through the clk tree.
>
> Obviously they are patches for Samsung clock drivers. ;)
>
> The issue here is that there is a number of patches already merged in
> Samsung tree on which the patches discussed here depend.
OK, I think I misread the original email. I thought you were asking for
future pull requests to go through the samsung tree, but you only mean
the ones in this thread. No problem there.
Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Regards,
Mike
>
> >
> >>
> >> How do you think? Basically I need your agreement for it.
> >
> > Based on the above pull requests I do not see the need for changing how
> > code gets merged.
>
> As long as there are no dependencies on arch code and series being
> applied do not touch arch code, this is perfectly fine. Unfortunately
> this is rarely the case, at least for Samsung platforms and at least for
> now. After we finish with arch clean-up and move all code to appropriate
> subsystems, it should become easier, though.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 22:07 ` Mike Turquette
@ 2014-05-14 22:16 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-15 21:11 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-05-14 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 15.05.2014 00:07, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-05-14 13:20:14)
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 14.05.2014 22:13, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-14 12:59:22)
>>>> On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
>>>> they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
>>>> stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
>>>> tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
>>>> required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
>>>
>>> The Samsung clk pull requests only touch two arch/arm Kconfig files and
>>> one dtsi file. That's not a lot of arch/arm churn. Is there a strong
>>> reason that this needs to go through the samsung/arm-soc trees?
>>> Otherwise it should continue to go through the clk tree.
>>
>> Obviously they are patches for Samsung clock drivers. ;)
>>
>> The issue here is that there is a number of patches already merged in
>> Samsung tree on which the patches discussed here depend.
>
> OK, I think I misread the original email. I thought you were asking for
> future pull requests to go through the samsung tree, but you only mean
> the ones in this thread. No problem there.
>
> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Thanks.
As you probably noticed with my pull request for 3.15, we've been
getting quite a lot of burden due to dependencies between arch and clk
patches lastly, but this is inevitable when we are moving things out of
arch.
The good news is that after patches from this pull request series, we
will end up with just one, more or less active platform (s5pv210) that
needs to be converted (and work already in progress).
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-14 22:16 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-05-15 21:11 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-16 23:57 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-05-15 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 05/15/14 07:16, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 15.05.2014 00:07, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-05-14 13:20:14)
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> On 14.05.2014 22:13, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-05-14 12:59:22)
>>>>> On 05/15/14 03:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've talked to Tomasz about current samsung related clock stuff. Since
>>>>> they are mostly having dependency on samsung tree now not clock core
>>>>> stuff, so would be better if it could be sent to upstream via samsung
>>>>> tree. And as you know, updating arch/arm/ and clock stuff are usually
>>>>> required for adding new SoC or supporting CCF newly...
>>>>
>>>> The Samsung clk pull requests only touch two arch/arm Kconfig files and
>>>> one dtsi file. That's not a lot of arch/arm churn. Is there a strong
>>>> reason that this needs to go through the samsung/arm-soc trees?
>>>> Otherwise it should continue to go through the clk tree.
>>>
>>> Obviously they are patches for Samsung clock drivers. ;)
>>>
>>> The issue here is that there is a number of patches already merged in
>>> Samsung tree on which the patches discussed here depend.
>>
>> OK, I think I misread the original email. I thought you were asking for
>> future pull requests to go through the samsung tree, but you only mean
>> the ones in this thread. No problem there.
>>
>> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>
Mike, thanks for your ack on this whole pull-requests.
I will pull 1 to 4 into samsung tree for 3.16.
> Thanks.
>
> As you probably noticed with my pull request for 3.15, we've been
> getting quite a lot of burden due to dependencies between arch and clk
> patches lastly, but this is inevitable when we are moving things out of
> arch.
>
> The good news is that after patches from this pull request series, we
> will end up with just one, more or less active platform (s5pv210) that
> needs to be converted (and work already in progress).
>
Sounds great.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL 1/4] Samsung clock Exynos5260 support for v3.16
2014-05-15 21:11 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-05-16 23:57 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-05-16 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 05/16/14 06:11, Kukjin Kim wrote:
[...]
>>> OK, I think I misread the original email. I thought you were asking for
>>> future pull requests to go through the samsung tree, but you only mean
>>> the ones in this thread. No problem there.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>>
> Mike, thanks for your ack on this whole pull-requests.
>
> I will pull 1 to 4 into samsung tree for 3.16.
>
Done, thanks.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread