public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: OF: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources.
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:48:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5379319.g8IPYmY2Zo@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227193627.GA7773@obsidianresearch.com>

On Thursday 27 February 2014 12:36:27 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 07:12:59PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > The outstanding issue is how to fix pci_address_to_pio() as it will not
> > for for range->cpu_addr > IO_SPACE_LIMIT (16MB in my case).
> 
> The default actually looks fine to me, it is the correct behavior for
> systems that actually have a dedicated IO space (like x86) where the
> 'CPU' value for IO is the exact value used in the IO accessor
> instructions. In this case the IO_SPACE_LIMIT test is appropriate.

Right.

> It also looks correct for architectures that use the CPU MMIO address
> as the IO address directly (where IO_SPACE_LIMIT would be 4G)

Are you aware of any that still do? I thought we had stopped doing
that.

> Architectures that use the virtual IO window technique will always
> require a custom pci_address_to_pio implementation.

Hmm, at the moment we only call it from of_address_to_resource(),
which in turn does not get called on PCI devices, and does not
call pci_address_to_pio for 'simple' platform devices. The only
case I can think of where it actually matters is when we have
ISA devices in DT that use an I/O port address in the reg property,
and that case hopefully won't happen on ARM32 or ARM64.

> BTW, something that occured to me after reading the patches:
> 
> For ARM64 you might want to think about doing away with the fixed
> virtual IO window like we see in ARM32. Just use the CPU MMIO address
> directly within the kernel, and implement a ioport_map to setup the MM
> on demand.
> 
> I think the legacy reasons for having all those layers of translation
> are probably not applicable to ARM64, and it is much simpler without
> the extra translation step....
> 
> Arnd, what do you think?

Either I don't like it or I misunderstand you ;-)

Most PCI drivers normally don't call ioport_map or pci_iomap, so
we can't just do it there. If you are thinking of calling ioport_map
for every PCI device that has an I/O BAR and storing the virtual
address in the pci_dev resource, I don't see what that gains us
in terms of complexity, and it will also break /dev/port.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-27 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-27 13:06 [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Support for creating generic host_bridge from device tree Liviu Dudau
     [not found] ` < 1393506402-11474-5-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
2014-02-27 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: OF: Fix the conversion of IO ranges into IO resources Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 13:20   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 13:22   ` Andrew Murray
2014-02-27 13:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 18:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-27 19:12     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 19:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-27 19:48         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-27 20:07           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-27 20:22             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-28 12:50               ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] pci: Create pci_host_bridge before its associated bus in pci_create_root_bus Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 13:22   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pci: Introduce a domain number for pci_host_bridge Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 13:22   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] pci: Add support for creating a generic host_bridge from device tree Liviu Dudau
2014-02-27 13:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 13:48     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-27 23:32     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-28  8:46       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-28  9:55       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-03-02  1:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-03-02  1:25           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-03-07 18:58     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5379319.g8IPYmY2Zo@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox