From: minyard@acm.org (Corey Minyard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Set hardirq tracing to on when idling
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53852D96.60006@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6082113.tHepRBe99K@wuerfel>
On 05/27/2014 02:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:53:59 Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/27/14 11:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> You also commented in that thread about stop_critical_timings()/
>>> start_critical_timings(). Corey, can you look at that, too? I
>>> think it's designed to avoid the issue you are seeing but
>>> for some reason doesn't.
>> I sent a patch last week to "solve" this problem. I'm not sure if it's
>> right but it works for me.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/19/607
> I think that one was also wrong, as the intention of the existing
> stop_critical_timings() function is already to do the same that
> Corey's patch does, i.e. stop the trace before we go to idle as
> if we were turning IRQs on.
>
> Corey, does it work for you if you replace the new trace_hardirqs_on()
> you added with time_hardirqs_on() or stop_critical_timing()?
Well, more information on this. It turns out that the generic idle loop
calls stop_critical_timing() and start_critical timing(), so the
arch_cpu_idle() shouldn't have to.
However, the idle loop calls rcu_idle_enter() after it calls
stop_critical_timing(), and that is resetting the critical timing, it
appears. It's disabling/enabling interrupts in rcu_idle_enter(). If I
switch the order of the rcu_idle and critical timing calls, the issue
goes away.
Stephen's patch does not seem to be necessary for my issue. I tried with
the patch applied, too. It doesn't seem to hurt, at least. It did not
fix the problem by itself, though.
-corey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-25 19:15 [PATCH] arm: Set hardirq tracing to on when idling minyard at acm.org
2014-05-26 9:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 13:21 ` Corey Minyard
2014-05-27 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 18:50 ` Corey Minyard
2014-05-27 16:38 ` Stanislav Meduna
2014-05-27 18:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-05-27 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 19:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-05-27 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 20:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-05-28 0:28 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2014-05-28 6:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53852D96.60006@acm.org \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).