[PATCH 1/1] clk: exynos5420: Staticize local variables

[tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)]

Hi Sachin,

On 28.05.2014 10:01, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 17:28, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Local symbols are made static.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> index 9d7d7eed03fd..41b507baf5d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock
>>         FFACTOR(0, "ff_dout_spll2", "mout_sclk_spll", 1, 2, 0),
>>  };
>>
>> -struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>> +static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_isp", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 0, 3),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_mscl", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 4, 3),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_wcore", mout_group2_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 16, 3),
>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", mout_group2_p, SRC_DISP10, 4, 3),
>>  };
>>
>> -struct samsung_div_clock exynos5800_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>> +static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5800_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         DIV(0, "dout_aclk400_wcore", "mout_aclk400_wcore", DIV_TOP0, 16, 3),
>>
>>         DIV(0, "dout_aclk550_cam", "mout_aclk550_cam",
>> @@ -539,14 +539,14 @@ struct samsung_div_clock exynos5800_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         DIV(0, "dout_sclk_sw", "sclk_spll", DIV_TOP9, 24, 6),
>>  };
>>
>> -struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5800_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
>> +static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5800_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         GATE(CLK_ACLK550_CAM, "aclk550_cam", "mout_user_aclk550_cam",
>>                                 GATE_BUS_TOP, 24, 0, 0),
>>         GATE(CLK_ACLK432_SCALER, "aclk432_scaler", "mout_user_aclk432_scaler",
>>                                 GATE_BUS_TOP, 27, 0, 0),
>>  };
>>
>> -struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>> +static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         MUX(0, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, TOP_SPARE2, 0, 1),
>>         MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_wcore_bpll", mout_aclk400_wcore_bpll_p,
>>                                 TOP_SPARE2, 4, 1),
>> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", mout_group3_p, SRC_DISP10, 4, 1),
>>  };
>>
>> -struct samsung_div_clock exynos5420_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>> +static struct samsung_div_clock exynos5420_div_clks[] __initdata = {
>>         DIV(0, "dout_aclk400_wcore", "mout_aclk400_wcore_bpll",
>>                         DIV_TOP0, 16, 3),
>>  };
>> --
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Tomasz is probably on vacation. Can you please take this patch?
> 

Sorry for late reply. Yes, I'm on vacation right now until 9.06, so I'm
going to be less active through this period of time.

As for this patch, I'm not sure if it will apply to Mike's tree, as it
seems to depend on patches that went through Kukjin's tree. Since this
isn't anything critical, I'd suggest deferring this for next release, so
I can pick this patch up directly after 3.16-rc1 is released.

In case you want to proceed with it now, feel free to add my Acked-by.

Best regards,
Tomasz