From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/11] sched: remove a wake_affine condition
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:09:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5385FC38.3050201@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtB_4bQxBOUJ4tCFRVqzHDRVXj3YPkyzyTv_h-sgm8NwEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent & Peter,
On 28/05/14 07:49, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>
> Nick,
>
> While doing some rework on the wake affine part of the scheduler, i
> failed to catch the use case that takes advantage of a condition that
> you added some while ago with the commit
> a3f21bce1fefdf92a4d1705e888d390b10f3ac6f
>
> Could you help us to clarify the 2 first lines of the test that you added ?
> + if ((tl <= load &&
> + tl + target_load(cpu, idx) <=
> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) ||
> + 100*(tl + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) <= imbalance*load) {
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
>>
>>>
>>>>> commit a3f21bce1fefdf92a4d1705e888d390b10f3ac6f
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + if ((tl <= load &&
>>>>> + tl + target_load(cpu, idx) <= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) ||
>>>>> + 100*(tl + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) <= imbalance*load) {
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So back when the code got introduced, it read:
>>>>>
>>>>> target_load(prev_cpu, idx) - sync*SCHED_LOAD_SCALE < source_load(this_cpu, idx) &&
>>>>> target_load(prev_cpu, idx) - sync*SCHED_LOAD_SCALE + target_load(this_cpu, idx) < SCHED_LOAD_SCALE
>>>>>
Shouldn't this be
target_load(this_cpu, idx) - sync*SCHED_LOAD_SCALE <= source_load(prev_cpu, idx) &&
target_load(this_cpu, idx) - sync*SCHED_LOAD_SCALE + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE
"[PATCH] sched: implement smpnice" (2dd73a4f09beacadde827a032cf15fd8b1fa3d48)
mentions that SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE (IMHO, should be SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) represents
the load contribution of a single task. So I read the second part as if
the sum of the load of this_cpu and prev_cpu is smaller or equal to the
(maximal) load contribution (maximal possible effect) of a single task.
There is even a comment in "[PATCH] sched: tweak affine wakeups"
(a3f21bce1fefdf92a4d1705e888d390b10f3ac6f) in try_to_wake_up() when
SCHED_LOAD_SCALE gets subtracted from tl = this_load =
target_load(this_cpu, idx):
+ * If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
+ * effect of the currently running task from the load
+ * of the current CPU:
"[PATCH] sched: implement smpnice" then replaces SCHED_LOAD_SCALE w/
+static inline unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_task(int cpu)
+{
+ runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ unsigned long n = rq->nr_running;
+
+ return n ? rq->raw_weighted_load / n : SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
-- Dietmar
>>>>> So while the first line makes some sense, the second line is still
>>>>> somewhat challenging.
>>>>>
>>>>> I read the second line something like: if there's less than one full
>>>>> task running on the combined cpus.
>>>>
>>>> ok. your explanation makes sense
>>>
>>> Maybe, its still slightly weird :-)
>>>
>>>>>
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 15:52 [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 10:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:16 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 6:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2014-05-28 15:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] sched: Allow all archs to set the power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 14:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 9:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-04 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-05 8:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-16 9:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 13:22 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:17 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-06 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 13:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 8:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] sched: add per rq cpu_power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED" Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] sched: get CPU's activity statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 12:10 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 13:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:47 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 16:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 12:03 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:41 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:20 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 7:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 8:55 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 9:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:25 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:44 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:00 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 10:36 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 11:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 11:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 13:09 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 13:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:16 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 23:11 ` Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 9:50 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-01 11:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-02 14:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 0:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 13:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 6:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 17:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 12:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 13:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-30 20:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] sched: replace capacity by activity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 6:21 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-06-03 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 6:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 19:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 15:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 5:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5385FC38.3050201@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).