From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] arm: alignment trap tweaks
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:21:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5385FF06.3020506@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1399028497.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On 07/05/14 10:51, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Revisiting the alignment trap again thanks to an obscure corner case
> with NEON alignment hints - patch 1 is a repost from a while back as a
> ping, because modern userspaces really should just get a resounding
> "Don't do that!" if they manage to step outside the architecture.
> Patch 2 is the fix for cases where fixup does need to be turned back on
> for whatever reason.
>
Ping. Any comment on these? Admittedly it's a very hard-to-hit bug, but
it's a bug all the same.
Thanks,
Robin.
> The following testcase compiled with -marm illustrates the problem:
> with fixup enabled, when the VLD1 instruction with the alignment hint
> set faults by performing a misaligned access, it fails to load the NEON
> registers as expected and eventually writes back nonsense to the base
> register, resulting in a misleading segfault on the next iteration.
>
> --->8---
>
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> static uint8_t buffer[256], got[256];
>
> int main() {
> uint8_t *base = (uint8_t *)((intptr_t)buffer + 0x7 & ~0x7);
> void *p = base, *q = got;
> int i;
>
> for (i=0; i<64; i++)
> base[i] = i;
> for (i=0; i<4; i++) {
> asm volatile ("vld1.8 {d0,d1}, [%0]\n vst1.8 {d0,d1}, [%1]\n"
> : "=r"(p),"=r"(q) : "0"(p),"1"(q) : "d0","d1");
> printf("unaligned: %p [%d,%d,%d,...]\n", p++, got[0], got[1], got[2]);
> }
> p = base;
> for (i=0; i<4; i++) {
> asm volatile ("vld1.8 {d0,d1}, [%0:64]\n vst1.8 {d0,d1}, [%1]\n"
> : "=r"(p),"=r"(q) : "0"(p),"1"(q) : "d0","d1");
> printf("misaligned: %p [%d,%d,%d,...]\n", p++, got[0], got[1], got[2]);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> --->8---
>
> Robin Murphy (2):
> arm: SIGBUS on unsupported ARMv6 unaligned accesses
> arm: don't break misaligned NEON load/store
>
> arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 9:51 [PATCH 0/2] arm: alignment trap tweaks Robin Murphy
2014-05-07 9:51 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] arm: SIGBUS on unsupported ARMv6 unaligned accesses Robin Murphy
2014-05-07 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: don't break misaligned NEON load/store Robin Murphy
2014-05-28 15:21 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5385FF06.3020506@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).