From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:07:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: use c15resume firmware method if secure firmware is enabled In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-6-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> References: <1401712543-14281-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1401712543-14281-6-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Message-ID: <538C7722.8020706@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Use c15resume firmware method instead of accessing the registers > directly in exynos_cpu_restore_register() if secure firmware is > enabled. This affects both PM resume method and cpuidle AFTR mode. > > This patch shouldn't cause any functionality changes on boards that > don't use secure firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > index cf09383..aeff99e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -232,6 +233,9 @@ static void exynos_cpu_restore_register(void) > { > unsigned long tmp; > > + if (call_firmware_op(c15resume, save_arm_register) == 0) > + return; > + As I mentioned in my comments to patch 2/7, instead of introducing heavily SoC-specific operations, I'd rather add more general suspend and resume firmware operations which would take care of both saving and restoring those registers. Best regards, Tomasz