From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:10:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: EXYNOS: PM: fix register setup on EXYNOS4x12 for AFTR mode code In-Reply-To: <1401712543-14281-7-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> References: <1401712543-14281-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1401712543-14281-7-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Message-ID: <538C77AD.1000801@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 02.06.2014 14:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Add S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION register setup for EXYNOS4x12 to AFTR > mode code. Without this setup AFTR mode doesn't show any benefit > over WFI one. When this setup is applied AFTR mode reduces power > consumption by ~12% (as measured on Trats2 board). > > This change is a preparation for adding secure firmware support to > EXYNOS cpuidle driver. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > index aeff99e..0fb9a5a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > @@ -456,6 +456,10 @@ static int exynos_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, > case CPU_PM_ENTER: > if (cpu == 0) { > exynos_pm_central_suspend(); > + if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412()) > + __raw_writel(S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFI0 | > + S5P_USE_STANDBY_WFE0, > + S5P_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION); I wonder whether this isn't required on any Exynos SoC in general, as this mask decides which STANDBY_WFI/WFE signals are considered before entering the lower power state. Also you should check the behavior with Krzysztof's patch adding support for delayed reset assertion, which should cause WFI/WFE signals of CPUs powered down to be kept asserted. Best regards, Tomasz