From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:34:53 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V2 03/19] irqchip: crossbar: Skip some irqs from getting
 mapped to crossbar
In-Reply-To: <539AA08A.7010001@ti.com>
References: <1402574007-13987-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
 <1402574007-13987-4-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
 <20140612125134.GS8664@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20140612135715.GE17845@atomide.com>
 <20140612140508.GC8664@titan.lakedaemon.net> <539AA08A.7010001@ti.com>
Message-ID: <539ADAD5.1000904@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 13 June 2014 12:26 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On Thursday 12 June 2014 07:35 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 06:57:15AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> [140612 05:52]:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:23:11PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>> From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> When, in the system due to varied reasons, interrupts might be unusable
>>>>> due to hardware behavior, but register maps do exist, then those interrupts
>>>>> should be skipped while mapping irq to crossbars.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>>
>>>> Tony, have you applied these somewhere already?
>>>
>>> I think some of these I had applied into a branch ready for
>>> merging but then it was discovered that further changes
>>> were needed and the branch was dropped.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>> Sricharan, please remove my Signed-off-by from this series.
>>> If I end up applying it for merging my scripts will add it
>>> automatically.
>>
>> Do you have other changes outside of irqchip depending on this series?
>> If so, I can set up a topic branch for you guys to base off of.
>> Otherwise, I'll just apply them to irqchip/core when they're ready.
>>
>  There are dts changes which are dependent upon this series.
> 
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg108116.html
> 
>> Also, Sricharan, when you respin this, please clearly identify (in the
>> comment section) those patches that need to be flagged for stable.  It
>> would be helpful if they were the first patches in the series as well.
> 
> Ok, i will point this out clearly.
 Infact since the dts node is not present in the older kernel (even now),
 the driver itself is not used. So i feel there is nothing to be flagged
  for stable as such.

Regards,
 Sricharan