From: d-gerlach@ti.com (Dave Gerlach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Change hardreset soc_ops for AM43XX
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:19:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539F5136.60605@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406160441150.26773@utopia.booyaka.com>
Paul,
On 06/15/2014 11:43 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Dave,
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>
>> am43xx reset register layout is more similar to am33xx than omap4 so
>> use the am33xx functions for hwmod hardreset soc_ops rather than the
>> currently used omap4 functions. Without this, assert_hardreset and
>> deassert_hardreset will not work on am43xx.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> index 66c60fe..1c0885b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> @@ -4251,9 +4251,9 @@ void __init omap_hwmod_init(void)
>> soc_ops.enable_module = _omap4_enable_module;
>> soc_ops.disable_module = _omap4_disable_module;
>> soc_ops.wait_target_ready = _omap4_wait_target_ready;
>> - soc_ops.assert_hardreset = _omap4_assert_hardreset;
>> - soc_ops.deassert_hardreset = _omap4_deassert_hardreset;
>> - soc_ops.is_hardreset_asserted = _omap4_is_hardreset_asserted;
>> + soc_ops.assert_hardreset = _am33xx_assert_hardreset;
>> + soc_ops.deassert_hardreset = _am33xx_deassert_hardreset;
>> + soc_ops.is_hardreset_asserted = _am33xx_is_hardreset_asserted;
>> soc_ops.init_clkdm = _init_clkdm;
>> } else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
>> soc_ops.enable_module = _am33xx_enable_module;
>
> Should AM43XX be using the _am33xx_{enable,disable}_module and
> wait_target_ready functions?
AM43xx has been using the _omap4_{enable,disable}_module functions
without issue. Nothing is currently using the hardreset ops for am43xx
which is why it went unnoticed but I saw the issue when I tried to use
them for the wkup_m3 hwmod and they failed during internal development.
With that said, am43xx clockdomains have prcm_partition defined as part
of their data which is only used by the _omap4_{enable,disable}_module
functions and not the _am33xx functions so as the current configuration
stands the _omap4 variants are the right choice.
Regards,
Dave
>
>
> - Paul
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-16 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 20:59 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Change hardreset soc_ops for AM43XX Dave Gerlach
2014-06-13 19:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-06-16 1:56 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-06-16 20:11 ` Dave Gerlach
2014-06-16 4:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-06-16 20:19 ` Dave Gerlach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539F5136.60605@ti.com \
--to=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).