From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:16:39 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: bcm_defconfig: re-enable BCM Kona SDHCI driver
In-Reply-To: <20140616215512.GC23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1402941376-29594-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org>
 <20140616215512.GC23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <539F6CC7.4010002@wwwdotorg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 06/16/2014 03:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:56:16PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> Since 5d01b7684b7e "mmc: simplify SDHCI Kconfig dependencies",
>> MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM is no longer selected by the BCM Kona SDHCI
>> driver which is enabled in this defconfig. This results in the
>> SDHCI driver not being built and a boot failure. Explictly
>> enable MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM in bcm_defconfig so the BCM Kona SDHCI
>> driver is built.
> 
> I really don't understand why MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM isn't selected by the
> sub-drivers.  sdhci-pltfm.c is a library module, which is only
> useful with one of the sub-drivers enabled.
> 
> So, rather than providing a multitude of dependent options, why not
> present people with:
> 
>  + sdhci drivers
>    + sdhci pci
>    + sdhci acpi
>    + Arasan
>    + Freescale eSDHC
>    + Nintendo Wii
>    + Dove
> 
> and leave MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM as a hidden option whose purpose is to
> enable building of sdhci-pltfm.c.

CC'ing Arnd, as author of 5d01b7684b7e "mmc: simplify SDHCI Kconfig
dependencies". I also forgot to do that on the patch that fixed
multi_v7_defconfig for this:-(