linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A0428C.10200@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140617110908.GH23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 17/06/14 12:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> ... at this point there is a narrowing cast followed by an implicit
>> widening. This results in compiler either ignoring r3 altogether or, if
>> spilling to the stack, generating code to set r3 to zero before doing
>> the store.
> 
> In actual fact, there's very little difference between the two
> implementations in terms of generated code.
> 
> The difference between them is what happens on the 64-bit big endian
> narrowing case, where we use __get_user_4 with your version.  This
> adds one additional instruction.

Good point.


> and 64-bit narrowed to 32-bit:
> 
>         str     lr, [sp, #-4]!
> -       mov     ip, r0
> +       mov     r3, r0
>         mov     r0, r1
>  #APP
>  @ 275 "t-getuser.c" 1
> -       bl      __get_user_8
> +       bl      __get_user_4
>  @ 0 "" 2
> -       str     r2, [ip, #0]
> +       str     r2, [r3, #0]
>         ldr     pc, [sp], #4

The later case avoids allocating r3 for the __get_user_x and should
reduce register pressure and, potentially, saves a few instructions
elsewhere (one of my rather large test functions does demonstrate this
effect).

I don't know if we care about that. If we do I'm certainly happy to put
a patch together than exploits this (whilst avoiding the add in the big
endian case).


Daniel.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12 15:42 [PATCH v3] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types Daniel Thompson
2014-06-12 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-17 10:17   ` Daniel Thompson
2014-06-17 11:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-17 13:28       ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2014-06-17 13:36         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-17 13:54           ` Daniel Thompson
2014-06-12 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-20 10:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Daniel Thompson
2014-07-10 19:47   ` [PATCH 3.16.0-rc3-rmk v5] " Daniel Thompson
2014-08-21  5:36     ` Victor Kamensky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A0428C.10200@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).