From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:59:27 +0200 Subject: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 4/7] ARM: stih416-b2020e: Enable PWM on the B2020 Rev-E In-Reply-To: <20140619101236.GA7390@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> References: <1403103172-19856-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1403103172-19856-4-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20140619090546.GB2131@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> <20140619092042.GB26560@lee--X1> <20140619101236.GA7390@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> Message-ID: <53A2C28F.1080007@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Peter, On 06/19/2014 12:12 PM, Peter Griffin wrote: > Hi Lee, > >>> Why are you only enabling this for rev-E board? >> >> Purely for testing purposes, as it's the only board I have. If >> anyone has the other revisions and would be happy to test the driver >> for me then great. > > Ok that's what I suspected. > > If you tell me how, I can test on a Rev C board. But as there are several other > revisions I think checking the board schematics would be the quickest way forward. Only Rev C & E are in the wild now, so checking these two boards will be enough. Thanks, Maxime > >>> If you make the stih415 DT PWM nodes part of this series as well, then >>> assuming there is no good reason to the contary, the PWM could >>> be enabled for both stih415/6 in the common stih41x-b2020 DTS file which >>> is also included by rev-E (assuming that PWM wiring is not some rev-E specific >>> thing). > > Can you add the stih415 bindings in V2 as well? > > regards, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Kernel mailing list > Kernel at stlinux.com > http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: