From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris BREZILLON)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] genirq: generic chip: export irq_map_generic_chip function
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 09:59:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A68CF0.8040303@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140621235108.GJ21711@titan.lakedaemon.net>
On 22/06/2014 01:51, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 05:01:21PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Export the generic irq map function in order to provide irq_domain ops with
>> generic mapping and specific of xlate function (needed by the new atmel
>> AIC driver).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irq.h | 2 ++
>> kernel/irq/generic-chip.c | 5 +++--
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
>> index 0d998d8..62af592 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
>> @@ -771,6 +771,8 @@ void irq_gc_eoi(struct irq_data *d);
>> int irq_gc_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on);
>>
>> /* Setup functions for irq_chip_generic */
>> +int irq_map_generic_chip(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>> + irq_hw_number_t hw_irq);
>> struct irq_chip_generic *
>> irq_alloc_generic_chip(const char *name, int nr_ct, unsigned int irq_base,
>> void __iomem *reg_base, irq_flow_handler_t handler);
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> index 452d6f2..cf80e7b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> @@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ static struct lock_class_key irq_nested_lock_class;
>> /*
>> * irq_map_generic_chip - Map a generic chip for an irq domain
>> */
>> -static int irq_map_generic_chip(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>> - irq_hw_number_t hw_irq)
>> +int irq_map_generic_chip(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>> + irq_hw_number_t hw_irq)
>> {
>> struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>> struct irq_domain_chip_generic *dgc = d->gc;
>> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static int irq_map_generic_chip(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>> irq_modify_status(virq, dgc->irq_flags_to_clear, dgc->irq_flags_to_set);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_map_generic_chip);
>>
>> struct irq_domain_ops irq_generic_chip_ops = {
>> .map = irq_map_generic_chip,
> Why can't you use irq_generic_chip_ops.map in your code and avoid this
> patch entirely?
Because in this case I'll have to remove constness from my
irq_domain_ops struct and initialize it in my init function.
This is not a big concern, but in general I tend to declare ops struct
with a const constraint.
Tell me if you still want me to drop this patch and rework my init process.
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-22 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 15:01 [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM: at91: move aic driver to drivers/irqchips Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] genirq: generic chip: export irq_map_generic_chip function Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-21 23:51 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-22 7:59 ` Boris BREZILLON [this message]
2014-06-23 13:07 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 15:07 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-23 17:50 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 20:10 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-23 22:14 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 22:17 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 22:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] irqchip: atmel-aic: move binding doc to interrupt-controller directory Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] irqchip: atmel-aic: add new atmel AIC driver Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-22 20:56 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-24 12:56 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-24 16:14 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-24 20:00 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-26 20:20 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-26 20:30 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-09 16:38 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] ARM: at91: introduce OLD_IRQ_AT91 Kconfig option Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: at91: enclose at91_aic_xx calls in IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OLD_IRQ_AT91) blocks Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] ARM: at91: make use of the new AIC driver for dt enabled boards Boris BREZILLON
2014-06-20 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: at91: remove old irq material Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM: at91: move aic driver to drivers/irqchips Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A68CF0.8040303@free-electrons.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).