From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:31:22 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/9] irqchip: GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
In-Reply-To: <1403705001.18068.6.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
References: <1403688530-23273-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <1403688530-23273-4-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <CAAhSdy11HQtiOD6XLqQcZ+zf_Z9Mx0nPrJ0ECNNuRkZt=CfdpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1403705001.18068.6.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Message-ID: <53AADD3A.2010102@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 25/06/14 15:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 19:26 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>>
>> Ian had send-out a patch long time back to extend
>> GIC dt-bindings for addressing this issue.
>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg283767.html)
> 
> I've been meaning to revisit this. Since that original patch I've been
> wondering if some sort of stride property wouldn't be better.

Possibly. I used something like that for the GICv3 redistributors, just
in case someone messes it up. Given the GICv2 track record, I probably
did the right thing...

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...