From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew.Jackson@arm.com (Andrew Jackson) Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:59:50 +0100 Subject: drm/i2c: tda998x: Set CEC I2C address from TDA I2C address In-Reply-To: <20140702153418.GM32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <53B3D1F8.7080106@arm.com> <20140702102513.GF32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <53B3E2E4.20209@arm.com> <20140702153418.GM32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <53B42C76.6060104@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/02/14 16:34, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:45:56AM +0100, Andrew Jackson wrote: >> On 07/02/14 11:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:33:44AM +0100, Andrew Jackson wrote: > Thanks, that's useful information to have. Also, it's worth pointing out > that the patch is whitespace damaged - tabs are converted to spaces, > which makes it unable to be applied. There's other reasons (see below) > that makes us unable to apply this patch too... > > As we all know, email clients know better than us humans how to format > email messages, which gives them carte blanche to screw up patches in > this way. > > I'd recommend that you talk to others in ARM Ltd about how they get > around this problem. > >> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments >> are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the >> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do >> not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any >> purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. > > This means that I can't take the patch, since applying it into a git > tree and then publishing it would violate this statement. Doing so > copies and stores the information, and makes it available to people > who were not the intended recipient of your email. > Indeed. I've now defeated the signature issue, or so I assert, so I will re-submit a clean version of the patch with additional documentation regarding the information on the various TDA998x devices. Thank you for your tolerance. Andrew