From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:06:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC In-Reply-To: <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> References: <1404310129-14667-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1404317194.4109.13.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> Message-ID: <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/02/2014 06:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 02.07.2014, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Griffin: >>> This series adds reset controller support for the STiH407 SoC. >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> - Update copyright to 2014 >>> - Add const qualifier >>> - Fix various whitespace issues >>> - Remove THIS_OWNER >>> - Move DT documentation into separate patch >>> >>> Peter Griffin (4): >>> reset: stih407: Add softreset, powerdown and picophy controllers >>> reset: sti: Document sti-picophyreset controllers bindings. >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 reset controller support. >>> >>> .../bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt | 42 ++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 16 +++ >>> arch/arm/mach-sti/Kconfig | 10 ++ >>> drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig | 4 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h | 61 ++++++++ >>> 7 files changed, 292 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt >>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h >> >> Looks good to me now. >> >> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel > > Do you have a tree for Reset? If not, which route do these patches > normally follow? > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. Philipp, does that sound reasonable? Regards, Maxime