linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:58:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BBC0D6.2090606@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2064691.ZpxCs0gfL8@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2014?07?08? 05:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:25 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> The use of _PDC is deprecated in ACPI 3.0 in favor of _OSC,
>> as ARM platform is supported only in ACPI 5.0 or higher version,
>> _PDC will not be used in ARM platform, so make Make _PDC only for
>> platforms with Intel CPUs.
>>
>> Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC and move _PDC related code in ACPI
>> processor driver into a single file processor_pdc.c, make x86
>> and ia64 select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC when ACPI is enabled.
>>
>> This patch also use pr_* to replace printk to fix the checkpatch
>> warning and factor acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() a little bit to
>> avoid duplicate pr_err() code.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/ia64/Kconfig             |    1 +
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig              |    1 +
>>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig          |   10 ++
>>  drivers/acpi/Makefile         |    1 +
>>  drivers/acpi/internal.h       |    5 +
>>  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |  198 ---------------------------------------
>>  drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c  |  206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> index f82b352..cde2626 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config IA64
>>  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>>  	select PCI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>  	select ACPI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>> +	select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
> The ARCH_HAS part doesn't seem to be particularly consistent with
> the existing naming.  ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC would be better IMO.

OK, I will update the patch.

>
>>  	select PM if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>  	select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>>  	select HAVE_IDE
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index 4865d44..d60cec7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config X86_64
>>  ### Arch settings
>>  config X86
>>  	def_bool y
>> +	select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
>>  	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
>>  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
>>  	select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index 70eaf7a..0e6f72d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -367,6 +367,16 @@ config ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY
>>  
>>  	If you are unsure what to do, do not enable this option.
>>  
>> +config ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC
>> +	bool
>> +	help
>> +	  The _PDC object provides OSPM a mechanism to convey to the platform
>> +	  the capabilities supported by OSPM for processor power management.
>> +	  This allows the platform to modify the ACPI namespace objects returning
>> +	  configuration information for processor power management based on the
>> +	  level of support provided by OSPM.The use of _PDC is deprecated in
>> +	  ACPI 3.0 in favor of _OSC.
> Is the help actually useful?  This doesn't seem to be user-selectable, does it?

Yes, my bad, I will remove the help in next version.

Thanks
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-02  8:47 [PATCH 0/4] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02  8:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08  9:55     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02  8:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08 10:07     ` Hanjun Guo
2014-07-02  8:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / processor: Introduce ARCH_HAS_ACPI_PDC Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08  9:58     ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-07-02  8:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-07-07 21:16   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-08  9:23     ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53BBC0D6.2090606@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).