From: trblinux@gmail.com (Tushar Behera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] clk: exynos-audss: Adapt to exising clock framework
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:39:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BFB7DF.3010205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BFB39F.6040606@samsung.com>
On 07/11/2014 03:21 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tushar,
>
> On 11.07.2014 11:37, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> The patchset is targetted as moving exising exynos-audss clock driver from being
>> a module driver. The driver is now registered through CLK_OF_DECLARE and is
>> inline with other Samsung clock drivers.
>
> I'm afraid I have to NAK this series or at least the part converting the
> driver back to use CLK_OF_DECLARE().
>
Considering the more prevalent usage of CLK_OF_DECLARE() in drivers/clk
led me into thinking it was the normal way for the clock drivers.
Keeping only one clock driver using a different approach looked odd to
me. Anyways, I don't have any other reason to pursue this case.
> We have deliberately made this driver a platform driver, because this is
> how drivers should be modeled in Linux kernel whenever possible.
> CLK_OF_DECLARE() should be only considered a hack to work around late
> initialization of driver model. Reverting this change without a good
> reason (and you haven't provided such) is just going backwards.
>
> Rest of this series is actually quite nice, though, as reusing Samsung
> clock helpers reduces the line count significantly, so if you could
> rework this to keep this driver a platform driver then we could get
> something I could ack.
>
Sure. There are still some valid cleanups even if we plan to retain the
platform driver infrastructure. I will split and repost.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
--
Tushar Behera
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 9:37 [PATCH 0/2] clk: exynos-audss: Adapt to exising clock framework Tushar Behera
2014-07-11 9:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: exynos-audss: Simplify code to get clock names Tushar Behera
2014-07-11 9:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: exynos-audss: Update as per existing framework Tushar Behera
2014-07-11 10:40 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-07-11 12:07 ` Tushar Behera
2014-07-11 9:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] clk: exynos-audss: Adapt to exising clock framework Tomasz Figa
2014-07-11 10:09 ` Tushar Behera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BFB7DF.3010205@gmail.com \
--to=trblinux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).