From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read, write}s*()
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:59:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C05E4A.2030708@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405092672-18549-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
On 07/11/14 08:31, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> This patch implements generic versions of readsb(), readsw(), readsl(),
> readsq(), writesb(), writesw(), writesl() and writesq(). Variants of
> these string functions for I/O accesses (ins*() and outs*() as well as
> ioread*_rep() and iowrite*_rep()) are now implemented in terms of the
> new functions.
>
> While at it, also make sure that any of the functions provided as
> fallback for architectures that don't override them can't be overridden
> subsequently.
>
> This is compile- and runtime-tested on 32-bit and 64-bit ARM and compile
> tested on Microblaze, s390, SPARC and Xtensa. For ARC, Blackfin, Metag,
> OpenRISC, Score and Unicore32 which also use asm-generic/io.h I couldn't
> find or build a cross-compiler that would run on my system. But by code
> inspection they shouldn't break with this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
There isn't any mention of why we're doing this in the commit text. It
looks like patch 2 and 3 sort of mention why.
I also wonder if it could be explained how this about turn is desired,
given that patch b2656a138ab7 (asm-generic: io: remove {read,write}
string functions, 2012-10-17) did the complete opposite. Can you please
explain?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 15:31 [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*() Thierry Reding
2014-07-11 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: Use include/asm-generic/io.h Thierry Reding
2014-07-11 16:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-12 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-12 14:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-11 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: " Thierry Reding
2014-07-11 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read,write}s*() Catalin Marinas
2014-07-11 21:59 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-07-14 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-14 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/io.h: Implement generic {read, write}s*() Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C05E4A.2030708@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).