From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 04:30:22 +0400 Subject: [PATCH v3+1 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x In-Reply-To: <20140711115406.GB2954@lee--X1> References: <1404906074-31992-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1404906074-31992-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20140711115406.GB2954@lee--X1> Message-ID: <53C0819E.4000202@cogentembedded.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 07/11/2014 03:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe > devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both > PCIe or one of each in any configuration. > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > Acked-by: Alexandre Torgue > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts > index 4e2df66..c3c2ac6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts > @@ -12,4 +12,16 @@ > / { > model = "STiH416 B2020"; > compatible = "st,stih416-b2020", "st,stih416"; > + > + soc { > + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 { > + phy_port0: port at fe382000 { I don't understand why are you creating the duplicate labels; doesn't 'dtc' complain about them? You could instead refer to them as: &miphy365x_phy { }; > + st,sata-gen = <3>; > + }; > + > + phy_port1: port at fe38a000 { > + st,pcie-tx-pol-inv; > + }; > + }; > + }; > }; [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi > index 84758d7..2b98a0a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > #include "stih41x.dtsi" > #include "stih416-clock.dtsi" > #include "stih416-pinctrl.dtsi" > + > +#include > #include > #include > / { > @@ -236,5 +238,25 @@ > resets = <&powerdown STIH416_KEYSCAN_POWERDOWN>, > <&softreset STIH416_KEYSCAN_SOFTRESET>; > }; > + > + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 { The ePAPR standard [1] says: The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model. > + compatible = "st,miphy365x-phy"; > + st,syscfg = <&syscfg_rear>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + phy_port0: port at fe382000 { > + #phy-cells = <1>; If these are PHY devices, they should be named "phy", not "port". > + reg = <0xfe382000 0x100>, <0xfe394000 0x100>, <0x824 0x4>; > + reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg"; > + }; > + > + phy_port1: port at fe38a000 { > + #phy-cells = <1>; > + reg = <0xfe38a000 0x100>, <0xfe804000 0x100>, <0x828 0x4>; > + reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg"; > + }; > + }; > }; > }; WBR, Sergei