From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:47:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] of: Add NVIDIA Tegra SATA controller binding In-Reply-To: <20140716131306.GB23384@ulmo> References: <1405500863-19696-2-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1405510814-31928-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <53C666E5.6030009@redhat.com> <20140716131306.GB23384@ulmo> Message-ID: <53C6908A.2050200@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 07/16/2014 03:13 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:49:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 07/16/2014 01:40 PM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >>> This patch adds device tree binding documentation for the SATA >>> controller found on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen >>> --- >>> v4: clarify mandatory clock order >> >> Thanks this and the new v4 of "ata: Add support for the Tegra124 SATA controller" >> both look good to me. So these 2 + v3 for the rest of the series are: >> >> Acked-by: Hans de Goede > > Like I said in my reply to PATCH v3 7/8, I think this mandatory clock > order is a mistake. We've plenty of other dt bindings where things need to be specified in a certain order, e.g. registers. So I don't really see what the problem is here. Regards, Hans