From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: riel@redhat.com (Rik van Riel)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity
In-Reply-To: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
References: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/28/2014 01:51 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> The usage_avg_contrib is based on the current implementation of
> the load avg tracking. I also have a version of the
> usage_avg_contrib that is based on the new implementation [3] but
> haven't provide the patches and results as [3] is still under
> review. I can provide change above [3] to change how 
> usage_avg_contrib is computed and adapt to new mecanism.
> 
> TODO: manage conflict with the next version of [4]

FWIW, your series makes sense to me, and only the first hunk of patch
8/12 looks like it would conflict with my patches, in that your patch
changes code that will only be reached in exceptional circumstances.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1pviAAoJEM553pKExN6D4IoH/3Ou8H8kM5zhgDc4sDY5h+0F
qFDZIwdCWtKL36QfuZXIS/SXzikzs8XjxG7PIDj/sIEcpzs5jzGvlqAr/nTbQGlo
2ONnXobwSYSPbf8tEKrX4sdPS4YH1sd8+DgHC9TdYOgnWhdjpvfrwA9vFHmsZZvC
SxlLKCwqdWgtQPCJiGGJGdQOaB+OsNAJcoyo8OyokdOUrpMX30bfLT+8TiAiB/zS
uKrjzj3yZbrd/CRgpTSYopZgtzxHciZLLuIAurw7BJrUPL8Q1SL1HQ5eC5q/eS07
hXJrD6/o2DDfWoyeT2eDdJ9QkZKxT3vDKqC4WyVYn/2JZMzD5C+PY3XmQk7uYbU=
=zV+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----